Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
The relationship between specific nasopharyngoscopic features and treatment deterioration with mandibular advancement
Eli Van de Perck1,2, Sara Op de Beeck1,2,3, Marijke Dieltjens1,2,4
1Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Study Objectives:
The variable efficacy of mandibular advancement device (MAD) treatment necessitates both accessible and accurate methods for patient selection. However, the role of awake nasopharyngoscopy for this purpose remains dubious. We introduced an assessment method based on anatomical upper airway features during tidal breathing for nasopharyngoscopy. The current study aimed to relate these features to MAD treatment outcome.
Methods:
One hundred patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea were prospectively recruited for MAD treatment in a fixed 75% degree of maximal protrusion. Nasopharyngoscopic observations during Müller's maneuver and tidal breathing were recorded both with and without MAD. Treatment outcome, confirmed by 3-month follow-up polysomnography with MAD, was classified as (1) apnea-hypopnea index reduction ≥ 50%, (2) treatment apnea-hypopnea index < 5 events/h, and (3) ≥ 10% increase in apnea-hypopnea index compared with baseline (treatment deterioration).
Results:
A complete dataset was obtained in 65 patients. After adjusting for baseline apnea-hypopnea index, body mass index, and supine dependency, the position of the soft palate (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-11.8; P = .013) and crowding of the oropharynx (odds ratio, 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-41.4; P = .017) were related to treatment deterioration. Addition of both features significantly (P = .031) improved the accuracy of baseline models based on clinical measurements alone. Moreover, with the MAD in situ, a posteriorly located soft palate (odds ratio, 9.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-56.3; P = .010) and a posteriorly located tongue base (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-35.9; P = .013) were associated with treatment deterioration.
Conclusions:
Awake nasopharyngoscopy might be a valuable office-based examination to exclude the risk of treatment deterioration and improve patient selection for MAD treatment.
Clinical Trial Registration:
Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Predicting Therapeutic Outcome of Mandibular Advancement Device Treatment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (PROMAD); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01532050; Identifier: NCT01532050.
