Phase Studies of Additively Manufactured Near Beta Titanium Alloy-Ti55511
Tuerdi Maimaitiyili1,2, Krystian Mosur3, Tomasz Kurzynowski3
1Materials and Process Development, Swerim AB, Isafjordsgatan 28A, 16440 Stockholm, Sweden.
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 11, 2020
Summary
Electron-beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM) successfully processed Ti55511, achieving high density. EBM altered phase composition, while SLM retained it, impacting microhardness.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Additive Manufacturing
- Metallurgy
Background:
- Additive manufacturing (AM) enables complex metal part fabrication.
- Titanium alloys, like Ti55511, are crucial for aerospace and medical applications.
- Comparing EBM and SLM for Ti55511 processing is vital for material selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare electron-beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM) effects on Ti55511.
- To evaluate chemical, phase, density, microstructure, and microhardness changes.
- To analyze powder characteristics post-processing for both EBM and SLM.
Main Methods:
- Processing of Ti55511 alloy using EBM and SLM.
- Characterization of as-built blocks for chemical and phase composition.
- Microstructural analysis and microhardness testing.
- Evaluation of powder morphology and characteristics after processing.
Main Results:
- Both EBM and SLM achieved high density (>99%) Ti55511 parts without defects.
- SLM retained the initial phase composition; EBM induced significant phase changes (α Ti-phase).
- EBM samples exhibited lamellar microstructures and higher microhardness (348 ± 30.20 HV) compared to SLM.
- Powder morphology showed similar variations for both EBM and SLM.
Conclusions:
- EBM and SLM are viable for Ti55511 additive manufacturing.
- Process choice significantly impacts phase composition and microstructure.
- EBM processing leads to increased microhardness in Ti55511 compared to SLM.
Keywords:
EBMEBSDRietveld analysisSLMTi55511XRDadditive manufacturingmicroscopysynchrotrontitanium alloy

