Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Murine Fetal Echocardiography
Published on: February 15, 2013
Accuracy of sonographic estimation of weight in fetuses with abdominal wall defects
Portia Spaulding1, Andrew Edwards2,3, Peter Coombs1,4
1Monash Women's, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Insights
Accurate fetal weight estimation is crucial for managing abdominal wall defects (AWDs). The Hadlock IV formula shows a higher detection rate for small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses compared to the Siemer formula, despite similar overall accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal medicine
- Fetal medicine
- Medical imaging
Background:
- Accurate fetal weight estimation is vital for managing fetuses with abdominal wall defects (AWDs).
- Growth restriction in AWD fetuses predicts perinatal morbidity and mortality.
- Existing sonographic formulas may underestimate weight in AWD fetuses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of the Siemer formula against the Hadlock IV formula for estimating fetal weight in fetuses with gastroschisis and omphalocele.
- To evaluate the formulas' effectiveness in detecting small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses with AWDs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 113 fetuses with AWDs over 13 years.
- Comparison of sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) formulas (Siemer vs. Hadlock IV) using Bland-Altman analysis.
- Assessment of SGA detection rates and false-positive rates for each formula.
Main Results:
- Both Siemer and Hadlock IV formulas demonstrated similar accuracy in predicting birthweight for AWD fetuses.
- The Hadlock IV formula exhibited higher detection rates for SGA fetuses (<10th and <3rd centiles) than the Siemer formula.
- The Hadlock IV formula also presented a higher false-positive rate in SGA detection.
Conclusions:
- The Siemer formula, designed for AWD fetuses, offers no clear clinical advantage over the Hadlock IV formula for fetal weight estimation.
- The Hadlock IV formula may be preferred for its superior detection of SGA fetuses, despite a higher false-positive rate.
Background:
Accurate estimation of fetal weight is essential in guiding management of fetuses with abdominal wall defects (AWDs), as growth restriction is an important predictor of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Several sonographic formulae are available involving multiple biometric parameters, but abdominal circumference measurements may underestimate weight in fetuses with AWDs. No formula has yet shown superior accuracy.
Aims:
The objectives of this study were to evaluate, in fetuses with gastroschisis and omphalocoele, the accuracy of a sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) formula proposed by Siemer and colleagues, specifically for use in fetuses with AWDs compared to the commonly used Hadlock IV formula in estimating fetal weight, and detecting small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses.
Materials And Methods:
A retrospective cohort of 113 fetuses with AWDs was identified from an Australian teaching hospital over 13 years. Pregnancy data and sonographic fetal biometry parameters were obtained. The accuracy of each formula in predicting birthweight was compared using Bland-Altman limits of agreement, and the intraclass correlation coefficient between EFW and actual birthweight. Performance of each formula in detecting SGA fetuses was determined.
Results:
The Siemer and Hadlock formulae have similar accuracies for predicting birthweight in fetuses with AWDs. The Hadlock formula has a higher detection rate for SGA < 10th centile and < 3rd centile compared to the Seimer formula (84% vs 68% and 83% vs 67% respectively), albeit with a higher false-positive rate.
Conclusion:
There is no clear clinical advantage in using the Siemer formula, which is specifically designed for fetuses with AWDs, over the Hadlock formula to estimate weight in fetuses with AWDs.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):

