Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy01:24

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

281
Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are grounded in the belief that our thoughts profoundly influence our emotions and actions. Advocates of CBT emphasize three core assumptions: first, that cognitions are identifiable and measurable; second, that they are central to psychological functioning; and third, that irrational or maladaptive beliefs can be replaced with rational and adaptive ones. This transformative approach to therapy has paved the way for specific models such as Albert...
281
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

119
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
119
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.6K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.6K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

43.4K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
43.4K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.8K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can large language models help predict results from a complex behavioural science study?

Royal Society open science·2024
Same author

Test many theories in many ways.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2024
Same author

Are we all implicit puritans? New evidence that work and sex are intuitively moralized in both traditional and non-traditional cultures.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

Exposing and overcoming the fixed-effect fallacy through crowd science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2022
Same author

Putting the Self in Self-Correction: Findings From the Loss-of-Confidence Project.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2021
Same author

Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results.

Psychological bulletin·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 24, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.2K

Quantifying the prevalence and adaptiveness of behavioral rationalizations.

Warren Tierney1, Eric Luis Uhlmann2

  • 1Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, Castletroy, LimerickV94 T9PX, Ireland. warrentierney@hotmail.com.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|April 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study explores the "rationality of rationalizations" thesis, investigating how past behavior influences attitudes and if justifications impact future actions. It examines potential benefits like improved well-being and social influence from rationalizing.

More Related Videos

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.9K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 24, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.2K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.9K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Science
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The "rationality of rationalizations" thesis posits that individuals rationalize their behaviors to maintain cognitive consistency.
  • Existing research often focuses on attitudes predicting behavior, but the influence of past behavior on attitudes requires further empirical investigation.
  • The self-perpetuating nature of rationalizations and their impact on subsequent actions remain underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically investigate critical, open questions surrounding the "rationality of rationalizations" thesis.
  • To determine the extent to which past behavior shapes current attitudes, challenging the traditional attitude-behavior causality.
  • To assess whether self-generated justifications influence future behaviors and confer psychological or social benefits.

Main Methods:

  • The study design involves empirical investigation into the dynamics of rationalization.
  • Methods focus on measuring the frequency of past behavior influencing attitudes.
  • Assessment of the impact of post hoc justifications on subsequent actions and outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Empirical data is needed to quantify the frequency of past behavior determining attitudes.
  • The degree to which rationalizations independently influence future actions is an open question.
  • The potential benefits of rationalization on well-being, social influence, and performance require empirical validation.

Conclusions:

  • Significant empirical questions remain regarding the "rationality of rationalizations" thesis.
  • Further research is necessary to understand the bidirectional relationship between attitudes and behavior.
  • The self-sustaining nature of rationalizations and their consequential benefits warrant detailed investigation.