Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Aspirin or anticoagulation after cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale: systematic review and meta-analysis of
Michele Romoli1,2, David Giannandrea3, Paolo Eusebi4
1Neurology Unit, Rimini "Infermi" Hospital - AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy. michele.romoli@auslromagna.it.
Insights
Anticoagulation does not offer a net benefit over antiplatelet therapy for preventing recurrent stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO). However, the Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score may help identify patients who could benefit from anticoagulation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with cryptogenic stroke, but closure has strict eligibility criteria.
- Most patients with PFO-related stroke receive medical management, yet optimal antithrombotic strategy remains uncertain.
- This study addresses the need to define the risk-benefit profile of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- To compare the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation versus antiplatelet treatment in patients with PFO-related stroke.
- To explore the role of the Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score in patient selection.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
- Searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases (2000-2019) for relevant RCTs.
- Assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB tool; analyzed stroke recurrence and major bleeding as primary outcomes.
Main Results:
- Five RCTs involving 1565 patients were included; 48.1% received anticoagulation.
- Anticoagulation showed no significant benefit in preventing recurrent stroke compared to antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.66, 95% CI 0.41-1.07).
- Anticoagulation was associated with a non-significant increase in major bleeding risk (OR=1.64, 95% CI 0.79-3.43).
- In patients with a high RoPE score, anticoagulation significantly reduced recurrent stroke risk (OR=0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.8).
Conclusions:
- Current meta-analysis indicates anticoagulation offers no net benefit over antiplatelets for stroke prevention in PFO patients.
- The RoPE score may aid in identifying subgroups of patients who could potentially benefit from anticoagulation.
- Further research is required to fully elucidate the risk-benefit profile of anticoagulation in selected PFO-related stroke patients.
Introduction:
Since closure has restrictive eligibility criteria, the vast majority of patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO) receive medical treatment. However, the optimal antithrombotic strategy is still unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to define risk/benefit profile of anticoagulation compared with antiplatelet treatment in PFO-related stroke.
Methods:
Systematic review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019117559). Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL database (2000-2019) for RCTs randomly allocating patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO to medical treatment. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB tool. Main outcomes were stroke recurrence and major bleeding. RoPE score-dependent analysis was implemented to define a possible role for patient selection.
Results:
Five RCTs met inclusion criteria (3 high-, 1 fair-, 1 poor-quality RCTs). Overall, meta-analysis included 1565 patients (mean age 55.5 years), 753 (48.1%) receiving anticoagulation. Compared with antiplatelet treatment, anticoagulation conveyed no net benefit in prevention of recurrent stroke (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.41-1.07, pheterogeneity = 0.46), and associated with a non-significant higher risk of major bleeding (OR = 1.64, 95% CI 0.79-3.43, pheterogeneity = 0.57). In patients with high RoPE score, anticoagulation significantly reduced the risk of recurrent stroke (OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.8, pheterogeneity = 0.88).
Conclusion:
Our meta-analysis shows that anticoagulation confers no net benefit in recurrent stroke prevention over antiplatelets in patients with PFO-related stroke. RoPE score might help in selecting patients benefiting from anticoagulation, but further trials are needed to delineate risk/benefit profile of anticoagulation.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

