Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025
Deep Dermal Injection As a Model of Candida albicans Skin Infection for Histological Analyses
Published on: June 13, 2018
[Clinical analysis of 61 cases of deep neck infection]
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the clinical experience in care for deep neck infection (DNI) and to analyze the factors influencing surgical treatment outcome. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 61 patients with DNI admitted to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery of Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital from March 2013 to April 2019, including 33 males and 28 females, aged from 6 months to 81 years with a median age of 49 years. Patients were divided into two groups, 31 cases with localized infection (neck abscess) in Group A and 30 cases with diffuse infection (neck necrotizing fasciitis) in Group B. Patients in two groups were compared for sex, age, hospital stay, diabetes, tracheostomy, drainage methods, mediastinal infection, and pathogenic bacteria. The influence of different drainage methods on hospital stay in Group A was analyzed. SPSS 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Of the 61 patients, 45 patients underwent surgical incision and drainage (21 cases in Group A and 24 cases in Group B), 23 patients underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (UG-FNA) and catheter drainage (10 cases in Group A and 13 cases in Group B), and 7 patients in Group B were treated with both drainage methods. Pathogens were cultured in 31 cases (50.82%). There were significant differences in hospital stay, drainage method and mediastinal infection (χ(2) values were 26.890, 8.687 and 6.035, respectively, P<0.05), but no significant difference was found in sex, age, diabetes, tracheotomy and pathogenic bacteria (χ(2) values were 0.157, 3.685, 2.434, 3.631 and 0.807, respectively, P>0.05) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in hospital stay between two drainage methods in patients in Group A (χ(2)=1.560, P>0.05). Conclusions: There were significant differences in hospital stay, drainage method and mediastinal infection between patients with localized infection and diffuse infection, as diffuse infection is often associated with serious complications. UG-FNA and catheter drainage is an optional method for the treatment of localized infection, with minimal invasion and no influence on hospital stay.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Acute Pharyngitis
Acute pharyngitis is the inflammation of the back of the throat (pharynx), commonly resulting in a sore throat. It is a frequently encountered condition that prompts individuals to seek medical advice.
Classification
Acute pharyngitis can be categorized based on its underlying cause:
01:30Tonsillitis I: Introduction
Etiology
Three primary contributing factors have been identified.
01:26Tonsillitis II: Management
01:19Veins of Head and Neck
On the other hand, the vertebral veins, unlike their arterial counterparts, are not primarily responsible for brain drainage. Instead, they drain the cervical vertebrae, spinal cord, and some small...
01:23Chronic Pharyngitis
Etiology
It often arises from persistent viral or bacterial infections affecting sinuses and tonsils.
Additional contributing factors include inadequate dental hygiene, mouth breathing, recurring tonsillitis, allergic rhinitis, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and exposure to smoke, chemicals, and other environmental pollutants. Allergic reactions to pollen, mold, and pet dander, chronic cough, excessive voice usage,...
01:29Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management