Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025
Induction of Complete Transection-Type Spinal Cord Injury in Mice
Published on: May 6, 2020
A mouse model of complete-crush transection spinal cord injury made by two operations
Chen Li1,2,3, Xingfei Zhu1,2, Chia-Ming Lee3
1Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200065, China.
Background:
More and more studies have focused on the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) by tissue engineering, but there is still no ideal animal model that can genuinely and objectively simulate the real pathological process in clinical practice. Also, given the increasing availability and use of genetically modified animals in basic science research, it has become essential to develop clinically related models for SCI for use in mice.
Methods:
Forty-eight C57BL/6 mice were divided into three groups (injured/sham/uninjured). We determined the scar range made by the first crush injury by specimen observation, hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, and immunofluorescence staining. Transection to completely remove a 2-mm spinal cord segment centered on the lesion core was completed 6 weeks after the first injury in injured groups, whereas the sham group only underwent re-exposure of the spinal cord without transection injury. The characteristics of this SCI model were fully ascertained by specimen observation, HE staining, immunofluorescence staining, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).
Results:
No mice died after the first injury. Histopathological findings suggested a scar range of 2 mm. After the second operation, 2 mice of the injured group and 1 mouse of the sham group died. The Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) score and motor evoked potential (MEP) results showed that the neurological function of mice did not recover. Immunostaining showed that there were no neurons or neurofilament residues in the lesion core 4 weeks after the second injury. Astrocytes encapsulated immune cells to form dense glial scars. Most immune cells were confined to the core of the lesion and formed fibrous scars with the fibroblasts. At the same time, there was considerable angiogenesis in the lesion core and around the injury. The results of qRT-PCR showed that Ptprc was highly expressed in the lesion core, while Gfap, nestin, Cnp, and Sv2b were highly expressed in the adjacent region. This suggests that the lesion core is a highly inflammatory zone, but there may be spontaneous neurogenesis adjacent to the lesion core.
Conclusions:
The mouse crash-complete transection SCI model made by the two operations has good simulation, high feasibility, and high reproducibility; it will be a useful tool for pre-clinical testing of SCI treatment.
