Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

05:25
Step By Step: Microsurgical training method combining two nonliving animal models
Published on: May 9, 2015
15.8K
Maintaining Effective Microsurgery Training with Reduced Utilisation of Live Rats
Amitabha Lahiri1, Sandeep Sebastin Muttath1, Siti Khadijah Yusoff1
1Department of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, National University Hospital, Singapore.
The Journal of Hand Surgery Asian-Pacific Volume
|April 22, 2020
Summary
Effective microsurgical skills training is achievable with fewer live rats. This study shows reduced animal use in surgical education without compromising skill acquisition or anastomosis success rates.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Education
- Microsurgery
- Animal Models in Research
Background:
- Microsurgery is crucial in many surgical fields, demanding high surgeon proficiency.
- Live rat models offer high fidelity for microsurgical training but raise ethical concerns.
- Developing effective training methods with reduced animal use is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if microsurgical skills can be effectively acquired by reducing the number of live rats used in training.
- To compare skill acquisition and outcomes between different training course structures with varying animal usage.
- To assess the feasibility of optimizing surgical training models for ethical and practical considerations.
Main Methods:
- Two distinct training course structures were implemented, maintaining total training hours.
- Participants were divided into groups using fewer live rats (four or three per participant) compared to conventional methods.
- Training time on synthetic and ex-vivo models was increased to compensate for reduced live animal use.
- Effectiveness was measured by comparing anastomosis patency rates, time per anastomosis, and rat utilization efficiency.
Main Results:
- Group B, utilizing three rats per participant, achieved significantly faster anastomosis times compared to Group A (four rats).
- Anastomosis patency rates were comparable between groups despite the reduced number of live rats.
- Training efficiency, indicated by rat utilization, improved with fewer animals per participant.
Conclusions:
- Live rat usage in microsurgical training can be significantly reduced.
- Reduced animal use does not compromise the quality of surgical skill acquisition or procedural outcomes.
- This study demonstrates a viable approach to ethical and effective microsurgical education.

