Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Research on constructing sponge city indicator and decision evaluation model with fuzzy multiple criteria method.
Hsueh-Sheng Chang1, Qingmu Su1
1Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Sponge city construction offers a sustainable urban water management solution. This study developed assessment indicators and found differences in how officials and the public perceive water management priorities and satisfaction.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Urban Planning
- Water Resource Management
Background:
- Cities worldwide face increasing water-related challenges, including extreme weather events and chronic stresses like water scarcity.
- Developing urban models where water and environment coexist is crucial for sustainable city development.
- Sponge city construction is proposed as a viable strategy to address these urban water issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To construct a comprehensive sponge city assessment indicator system.
- To compare the perceptions of government officials and the public regarding sponge city construction.
- To identify discrepancies in evaluating water management importance and satisfaction.
Main Methods:
- Developed a sponge city assessment indicator based on pre-assessment dimensions.
- The indicator encompasses three systems: water ecosystem, socioeconomic, and institutional/mechanism.
- Employed fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making, evaluating degrees of importance and satisfaction to compare official and public viewpoints.
Main Results:
- A significant difference (0.8-1) was observed in the evaluation dimensions between officials and the public.
- Discrepancies were noted in the perceived importance of water management and water use.
- Differences in satisfaction levels were found concerning water development, water efficiency, and institutional mechanisms.
Conclusions:
- The developed indicators provide a framework for evaluating sponge city construction and stormwater management.
- The fuzzy multiple criteria approach effectively highlights differing perspectives between officials and the public.
- Findings offer valuable insights for refining water management strategies and decision-making processes.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
