Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
A novel ensemble computational intelligence approach for the spatial prediction of land subsidence susceptibility
Alireza Arabameri1, Sunil Saha2, Jagabandhu Roy2
1Department of Geomorphology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 14117-13116, Iran.
Abstract:
Land subsidence (LS) is a significant problem that can cause loss of life, damage property, and disrupt local economies. The Semnan Plain is an important part of Iran, where LS is a major problem for sustainable development and management. The plain represents the changes occurring in 40% of the country. We introduce a novel-ensemble intelligence approach (called ANN-bagging) that uses bagging as a meta- or ensemble-classifier of an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict LS spatially on the Semnan Plain in Semnan Province, Iran. The ensemble model's goodness-of-fit (to training data) and prediction accuracy (of the validation data) are compared to benchmarks set by ANN-bagging. A total of 96 locations of LS and 12 LS conditioning factors (LSCFs) were collected. Each feature in the LS inventory map (LSIM) was randomly assigned to one of four groups or folds, each comprising 25% of cases. The novel ensemble model was trained using 75% (3 folds) and validated with the remaining 25% (1 fold) in a four-fold cross-validation (CV) system, which is used to control for the effects of the random selection of the training and validation datasets. LSCFs for LS prediction were selected using the information-gain ratio and multi-collinearity test methods. Factor significance was evaluated using a random forest (RF) model. Groundwater drawdown, land use and land cover, elevation, and lithology were the most important LSCFs. Using the k-fold CV approaches, twelve LS susceptibility maps (LSSMs) were prepared as each fold employed all three models (ANN-bagging, ANN, and bagging). The LS susceptibility mapping showed that between 5.7% and 12.6% of the plain had very high LS susceptibility. All three models produced LS susceptibility maps with acceptable prediction accuracies and goodness-of-fits, but the best maps were produced by the ANN-bagging ensemble method. Overall, LS risk was highest in agricultural areas with high groundwater drawdown in the flat lowlands on quaternary sediments (Qcf). Groundwater extraction rates should be monitored and potentially limited in regions of severe or high LS susceptibility. This investigation details a novel methodology that can help environmental planners and policy makers to mitigate LS to help achieve sustainability.
More Related Videos
12:26Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
Published on: October 11, 2016
09:44Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
Published on: October 16, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Levels of Use of a GIS
Manipulation and Analysis
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.