Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
Extended screening guidelines for the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm
Matthew L Carnevale1, Issam Koleilat1, Evan C Lipsitz1
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center and The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Insights
The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines identify more patients for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening than U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria. Expanded SVS guidelines reveal a higher prevalence of AAA rupture in those not meeting screening criteria.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Preventive Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines are standard for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening.
- Retrospective analysis shows many AAA patients don't meet USPSTF criteria.
- Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines offer expanded criteria for broader AAA screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the number of patients identified for AAA screening by USPSTF versus SVS guidelines.
- To evaluate the impact of expanded SVS criteria on AAA screening in a treated cohort.
Main Methods:
- Assessed demographic, comorbidity, and perioperative data from the Vascular Quality Initiative.
- Identified patients meeting USPSTF and SVS screening criteria for endovascular and open AAA repair.
- Collected clinical factors and demographic variables.
Main Results:
- USPSTF criteria identified <33% of AAA repair patients.
- SVS guidelines increased screening identification by 6-12%.
- Expanded SVS criteria identified an additional 21-34% of patients; 27-33% still met no criteria. Patients not meeting criteria had higher rupture prevalence (8.5% vs 4.4%).
Conclusions:
- Expanded SVS guidelines could double AAA identification rates.
- Smokers under 65 and elderly patients without smoking history are key groups for expanded screening.
- Current screening guidelines may miss significant AAA patient populations at higher rupture risk.
Background:
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines are the most widely used criteria for screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). However, when the USPSTF criteria are applied retrospectively to a group of patients who have undergone treatment for AAA, there are many patients who satisfy none of the AAA screening criteria. The more sensitive Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines have expanded the criteria for screening for AAA with the hope of capturing a greater fraction of those individuals who can undergo treatment for their AAA before presenting with AAA rupture. We sought to identify the number of patients who would have been identified as having criteria for screening for AAA by both the USPSTF and SVS criteria, in a cohort of patients who have undergone treatment for AAA.
Methods:
We assessed demographic, comorbidity, and perioperative complication data for all patients undergoing endovascular and open AAA repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative. Patients meeting each of the screening criteria were identified. Clinical factors and demographic variables were collected.
Results:
We identified 55,197 patients undergoing AAA repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative, including 44,602 patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and 10,595 patients undergoing open repair. Of these, the USPTF guidelines would have identified fewer than one-third of patients (32% EVAR and 33% open repair). Applying the SVS guidelines increased the number meeting criteria for screening by 6% and 12% for the EVAR and open repair cohorts, respectively. Finally, adoption of the expanded SVS guidelines (including the "weak recommendations") would have identified an additional 34% of EVAR patients and 21% of open AAA repair patients. Use of the expanded criteria would have resulted in 27% of patients undergoing EVAR and 33% of patients undergoing open AAA repair who would not have met any screening criteria. In EVAR patients not meeting the criteria, 52% were younger than 65 years had a history of heavy smoking. Of all those who did not meet screening criteria, ruptured AAA was twice as prevalent as those who met screening criteria (8.5% vs 4.4%; P ≤ .0001).
Conclusions:
Expanding established USPSTF screening guidelines to include the expanded SVS criteria may potentially double the number of patients identified with AAA. Smokers under the age of 65, and elderly patients 70 and older with no smoking history, represent two groups with AAA and potentially twice the risk of presenting with rupture.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests

