Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
[Anesthesia and intensive care ventilators: differences and usability in COVID-19 patients]
Q Notz1, J Herrmann1, J Stumpner1
1Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, understanding mechanical ventilator capabilities is crucial. This review clarifies differences between intensive care, anesthesia, and transport ventilators to aid clinical decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Respiratory Therapy
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic presents significant challenges, including potential shortages of intensive care ventilators.
- Healthcare professionals may lack awareness regarding the use of alternative ventilators in critical care settings.
- Uncertainty exists about the applicability of non-intensive care ventilators for patients with severe respiratory compromise.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of the conceptual and technical distinctions between various mechanical ventilator types.
- To inform clinicians about the capabilities and limitations of alternative ventilation devices during critical care scenarios.
- To address the safe and effective use of different ventilators in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Main Methods:
- Review of technical specifications and operational modes of intensive care ventilators.
- Analysis of modern anesthesia machines for their suitability in intensive care settings.
- Evaluation of transport ventilators, including their limitations and intended use.
- Discussion of unconventional ventilation methods and their contraindications.
Main Results:
- Intensive care ventilators are designed for complex lung mechanics, while anesthesia machines offer comparable modes but require careful management.
- Transport ventilators are primarily for short-term use with 100% oxygen and are not suitable for general intensive care.
- Unconventional methods like "ventilator-splitting" are not recommended due to safety concerns.
- Significant conceptual and technical differences exist across ventilator types, necessitating specialized knowledge.
Conclusions:
- Clinicians must understand the specific capabilities and limitations of each ventilator type to ensure patient safety.
- Anesthesia machines can serve as alternatives in intensive care but demand close monitoring and trained staff.
- Transport ventilators have specific, limited applications and are not interchangeable with intensive care units.
- Evidence-based understanding of mechanical ventilation is vital for managing respiratory failure during pandemics.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Oxygen Delivering System II: Venturi Mask and Transtracheal Oxygen
Venturi Mask
The Venturi mask, named after the Venturi effect, is designed to deliver precise oxygen concentrations. It consists of a large tube with an oxygen inlet that narrows down, causing a pressure drop that pulls air in through adjustable side ports. The mask is a lightweight,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...

