Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Effects of Surgical Masks on Cardiopulmonary Function in Healthy Subjects
Published on: February 12, 2021
Physiologic Effects from Using Tight- and Loose-Fitting Powered Air-Purifying Respirators on Inhaled Gases, Peak
Edward J Sinkule1, Jeffrey B Powell1, Elaine N Rubinstein2
1CDC/NIOSH/National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) showed acceptable physiologic stress in healthy workers across rest and various exercise intensities. Specific PAPR designs, particularly loose-fitting ones with large dead space, increased inhaled carbon dioxide and decreased oxygen at higher work rates.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Human Physiology
- Respiratory Protection
Background:
- Powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) are essential personal protective equipment across numerous industries.
- Understanding the physiological impact of PAPRs during physical exertion is critical for worker safety and performance.
- Previous research has not comprehensively evaluated PAPR stresses across diverse work intensities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the physiological stresses imposed by different PAPR types during rest and varying energy expenditure levels.
- To identify potential differences in PAPR tolerance based on gender and PAPR design (tight-fitting vs. loose-fitting).
Main Methods:
- Twelve males and twelve females participated, wearing one tight-fitting and three loose-fitting PAPRs.
- Participants underwent testing at rest and during simulated work at oxygen consumption rates of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 L·min-1.
- Continuous breath-by-breath measurements included inhaled CO2 (FICO2), inhaled O2 (FIO2), inhalation pressure, and end-inhalation temperature.
Main Results:
- Gender did not significantly affect any measured physiological variables.
- Loose-fitting PAPRs with larger dead space resulted in the highest minimum FICO2 at moderate and high energy expenditures.
- The lowest maximum FIO2 was observed with the largest dead space loose-fitting PAPR during high-intensity exercise.
- Peak inhalation pressures became negative at oxygen consumption rates exceeding 1.0 L·min-1, indicating inhalation flow surpassed blower capacity.
Conclusions:
- PAPRs appear physiologically tolerable for healthy workers across a range of physical activities.
- PAPR design, specifically dead space in loose-fitting models, influences inhaled gas concentrations during exertion.
- Further investigation is required to understand the air source when inhalation demand exceeds PAPR blower flow.
More Related Videos
09:33Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Wearable Devices to Identify Central Versus Peripheral Limitations During Exercise
Published on: December 19, 2024
08:44Author Spotlight: Integrating Alveolar-Capillary Reserve Measurements in Exercise Adaptation and Therapeutic Strategies
Published on: February 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pressure Relationships in Thoracic Cavity
Breathing Mechanisms
Both intra-alveolar and intrapleural pressures rely on specific lung properties. The ability to breathe—allowing air to enter the lungs...
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Factors Affecting Respiration
Pulmonary Ventilation: Inhalation
Boyle's law becomes particularly pertinent when examining respiratory...
Pulmonary Cycle: Exhalation
Requirements for Human Life
Oxygen
Atmospheric air is only about 20 percent oxygen, but that oxygen is a key component of the chemical reactions that keep the body alive, including the reactions that produce ATP. Brain cells are susceptible to a lack of oxygen because they require a...