Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

75.7K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
75.7K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

11.8K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
11.8K
The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

47.4K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
47.4K
Nondisjunction01:21

Nondisjunction

4.6K
Nondisjunction is the failure of homologous chromosomes or sister chromatids to separate correctly and move to the opposite poles of the cells. This produces daughter cells with abnormal chromosome numbers.  Nondisjunction is common during anaphase I or anaphase II of meiosis.  Mutations in synaptonemal complex proteins that attach homologous chromosomes increase the chances of nondisjunction in anaphase I of meiosis I. In contrast, mutations in topoisomerases and condensins that hold...
4.6K
Nondisjunction01:29

Nondisjunction

81.5K
During meiosis, chromosomes occasionally separate improperly. This occurs due to failure of homologous chromosome separation during meiosis I or failed sister chromatid separation during meiosis II. In some species, notably plants, nondisjunction can result in an organism with an entire additional set of chromosomes, which is called polyploidy. In humans, nondisjunction can occur during male or female gametogenesis and the resulting gametes possess one too many or one too few chromosomes.
81.5K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

27.7K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
27.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antonio García-Bellido: A brief history of flies, lineages, and a new developmental genetic logic.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Heterotypic intercellular adhesion tunes efficiency of cell-on-cell migration.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The dynamic evolution of panarthropod germ cell specification mechanisms.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same author

Evidence for Non-optimal Codon Choice in Highly Transcribed Sex-Biased Genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same author

HUH-tagged Cas9 as a platform for efficient ssODN-mediated knock-in via embryo and adult injection in insects.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Chromosome-scale genome assembly and annotation of the two-spotted cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

PBX-dependent and -independent Hox programs establish and maintain motor neuron terminal identity.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

NUDT21 regulates 3'UTR dynamics in epididymal principal cells to preserve sperm integrity.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

Cell size control emerges from the vein-dependent coordinated divisions of distinct cell groups in Drosophila wing.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

The people behind the papers - Kaoru Sugimura.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

The people behind the papers - Zhainib Amir-Ugokwe and Kristy Red-Horse.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2026
Same journal

In preprints: toward a holistic lineage-tracing map of mammalian embryogenesis.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.3K

Null hypotheses for developmental evolution.

Samuel H Church1, Cassandra G Extavour1,2

  • 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA church@g.harvard.edu extavour@oeb.harvard.edu.

Development (Cambridge, England)
|April 29, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Developmental biologists can define a null hypothesis for developmental evolution by analyzing extensive data across the tree of life. This approach challenges assumptions of rare change and increasing complexity in evolution.

Keywords:
AncestralConvergenceDerivedHomologyNull hypothesisPhylogenetic comparative methods

More Related Videos

4D Microscopy: Unraveling Caenorhabditis elegans Embryonic Development Using Nomarski Microscopy
08:38

4D Microscopy: Unraveling Caenorhabditis elegans Embryonic Development Using Nomarski Microscopy

Published on: October 8, 2020

3.0K
A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
05:51

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

26.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.3K
4D Microscopy: Unraveling Caenorhabditis elegans Embryonic Development Using Nomarski Microscopy
08:38

4D Microscopy: Unraveling Caenorhabditis elegans Embryonic Development Using Nomarski Microscopy

Published on: October 8, 2020

3.0K
A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
05:51

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

26.3K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Understanding the rate of evolutionary change in developmental processes is crucial.
  • Previous assumptions about developmental evolution were based on limited data.
  • The concept of a null hypothesis for developmental evolution is underdeveloped.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose the definition of a null hypothesis for developmental evolution.
  • To leverage current extensive developmental data for evolutionary insights.
  • To re-evaluate prior assumptions regarding the rarity of developmental change.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a large, diverse dataset of developmental biology information.
  • Comparative analysis of developmental traits across the tree of life.
  • Re-examination of existing evolutionary and developmental biology paradigms.

Main Results:

  • Developmental biologists are well-positioned to establish a null hypothesis for developmental evolution.
  • Unprecedented access to developmental data allows for deeper evolutionary analysis.
  • Challenging the assumption that developmental change is rare is necessary.

Conclusions:

  • A robust null hypothesis for developmental evolution can be formulated using current data.
  • This framework will refine our understanding of evolutionary processes.
  • It is essential to move beyond outdated assumptions about evolutionary optimization and complexity.