Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mouse Models of Cancer Study02:43

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

6.3K
Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
6.3K
What is Cancer?02:12

What is Cancer?

13.8K
Cells and tissues must meticulously coordinate their activities for the normal functioning of the human body. Therefore, they exhibit socially responsible behavior - resting, growing, dividing, differentiating, or dying - for the organism’s benefit. Cancer arises when cells divide uncontrollably and invade other tissues or organs.
Although people have known about cancer for centuries, it was only in 1761 that Giovanni Morgagni of Padua performed a detailed autopsy of...
13.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Virtual Tumors Enable Prediction of Personalized Therapeutic Combinations for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Cancer research·2026
Same author

Clone copy number diversity is linked to survival in lung cancer.

Nature·2025
Same author

Localized immune surveillance of primary melanoma in the skin deciphered through executable modeling.

Science advances·2023
Same author

HOXA9 has the hallmarks of a biological switch with implications in blood cancers.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Community voices: policy proposals to promote inclusion in academia through the lens of women in science.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Executable network of SARS-CoV-2-host interaction predicts drug combination treatments.

NPJ digital medicine·2022
Same journal

Imaging the hallmarks of cancer.

Nature reviews. Cancer·2026
Same journal

CLIM-TIME links tumour genetics to spatial immune architecture.

Nature reviews. Cancer·2026
Same journal

Serving sulfur to boost anti-tumour immunity.

Nature reviews. Cancer·2026
Same journal

How to give a bad talk.

Nature reviews. Cancer·2026
Same journal

Beyond oncogenesis: the unexplored benefits of viruses in cancer immunity.

Nature reviews. Cancer·2026
Same journal

3D multi-omics tumour atlases: from technology to biology and clinical translation.

Nature reviews. Cancer·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Generation of Tumor Organoids from Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer
08:54

Generation of Tumor Organoids from Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer

Published on: June 13, 2019

11.2K

Executable cancer models: successes and challenges.

Matthew A Clarke1, Jasmin Fisher2,3

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Nature Reviews. Cancer
|April 29, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Executable computational models integrate diverse cancer data for personalized treatment. These models offer predictive power and experimental validation, advancing precision medicine in oncology.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Recreating Melanoma Complexity with Patient-Derived Organoids for Immunotherapy Evaluation
05:33

Author Spotlight: Recreating Melanoma Complexity with Patient-Derived Organoids for Immunotherapy Evaluation

Published on: September 6, 2024

2.2K
Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
10:27

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts

Published on: July 25, 2020

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 23, 2025

Generation of Tumor Organoids from Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer
08:54

Generation of Tumor Organoids from Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer

Published on: June 13, 2019

11.2K
Author Spotlight: Recreating Melanoma Complexity with Patient-Derived Organoids for Immunotherapy Evaluation
05:33

Author Spotlight: Recreating Melanoma Complexity with Patient-Derived Organoids for Immunotherapy Evaluation

Published on: September 6, 2024

2.2K
Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
10:27

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts

Published on: July 25, 2020

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Cancer research
  • Systems biology

Background:

  • Cancer treatment decisions require integrating complex, multi-modal data (genomics, histopathology, imaging, proteomics).
  • Existing data integration strategies often lack meaningful prediction and experimental verification capabilities.
  • A need exists for novel approaches to synthesize vast biological information for clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain how executable computational models address the need for comprehensive data integration in cancer research.
  • To demonstrate the potential of executable models for predicting effective cancer therapies and advancing personalized medicine.
  • To highlight the role of executable models in understanding oncogenic signaling pathways and tumor regulation.

Main Methods:

  • Explanation of executable computational models and their structure.
  • Application of automated reasoning to executable models for mechanistic insights.
  • Discussion of extending models to patient-specific 'avatars' for personalized treatment prediction.

Main Results:

  • Executable models provide a framework for comprehensive data integration and experimental validation.
  • These models facilitate the interpretation of biological and clinical data, aiding in understanding cancer mechanisms.
  • Executable models coupled with automated reasoning enhance the understanding of oncogenic signaling pathways.

Conclusions:

  • Executable computational models are crucial for integrating diverse cancer data, offering predictive and verifiable insights.
  • Patient-specific computational models ('avatars') hold significant promise for advancing personalized cancer treatments and precision medicine.
  • Overcoming challenges in executable model development requires robust cross-disciplinary collaboration.