Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spanning Openings in Brick Walls01:20

Spanning Openings in Brick Walls

483
In brick wall construction, supporting structures are crucial for openings like windows and doors to maintain the integrity and support the weight of the wall above. These supports include lintels, corbels, and arches, each serving specific structural purposes.
Lintels are primary supports used to span openings and can be crafted from materials such as reinforced concrete, steel-reinforced brick masonry, or simple steel angles. These are straightforward to install and are typically concealed...
483
Expansion and Contraction in Masonry Walls01:19

Expansion and Contraction in Masonry Walls

1.2K
Masonry walls are subject to slight expansion and contraction due to variations in temperature and moisture. Thermal movement in masonry is relatively straightforward to measure and plan for. On the other hand, moisture movement poses more of a challenge. New clay masonry units typically absorb water and expand over time under normal environmental conditions. Conversely, new concrete masonry units tend to shrink as they lose the excess moisture acquired during their production process.
To...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Catastrophizing questionnaire: translation and psychometric validation in Brazilian adult orthodontic patients.

Dental press journal of orthodontics·2026
Same author

Plastic deformation evaluation of clear aligners exposed to different cleaning solutions.

The Angle orthodontist·2026
Same author

Preclinical in vitro study of streptococcus mutans accumulation in three fixed retainer designs: Microbiological assay.

Dental materials journal·2023
Same author

An alternative approach for the surgical correction of unilateral crossbite.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2022
Same author

Loads of continuous mechanics for uprighting the second molar on the second molar and premolar.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2021
Same author

Can we expect similar behavior among CuNiTi 35°C wires?

Dental press journal of orthodontics·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
07:16

Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques

Published on: October 20, 2023

1.7K

Expansion with transpalatal arch or continuous arch mechanics.

Ingrid Müller Ledra1, Luiz Gonzaga Gandini1, Renato Parsekian Martins2

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics : Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
|May 2, 2020
PubMed
Summary

The transpalatal arch (TPA) and continuous arch (CA) produced different forces for maxillary first molar expansion. TPA caused more rotation in the first molar, while CA affected the second molar.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.7K
Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires
08:46

Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires

Published on: July 24, 2018

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
07:16

Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques

Published on: October 20, 2023

1.7K
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.7K
Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires
08:46

Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires

Published on: July 24, 2018

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Biomechanical Engineering

Background:

  • Maxillary first molar expansion is crucial in treating crossbites.
  • Understanding the biomechanics of orthodontic appliances is essential for effective treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the 3-dimensional force systems of transpalatal arch (TPA) and continuous arch (CA) mechanics during maxillary molar expansion.

Main Methods:

  • A patient model with molars in crossbite was used.
  • Load cells measured forces (transverse, anteroposterior) and moments on molars with TPA and CA.
  • Statistical analysis using independent t tests evaluated the data.

Main Results:

  • Both TPA and CA produced distinct forces and moments at the first molar.
  • TPA generated greater Mz (-25.09 N·mm) and Net Mz (-22.08 N·mm) at the first molar compared to CA.
  • CA produced significant forces and moments at the second molar, which TPA did not.

Conclusions:

  • TPA and CA mechanics yield different expansion forces and rotational effects on maxillary molars.
  • TPA resulted in greater rotational side effects on the first molar.
  • CA exhibited side effects on the second molar.