Regularized Exploratory Bifactor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
Sunho Jung1, Dong Gi Seo2, Jungkyu Park3
1School of Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract:
Several methods of factor extraction have recently gained popularity as a procedure for dealing with estimation problems associated with small sample sizes, which can be found in the various behavioral science disciplines, such as comparative psychology and behavior genetics. Two popular approaches for particularly small samples (below 50) include unweighted least squares factor analysis (ULS-FA) and regularized exploratory factor analysis (REFA). However, it is unclear how well each of the approaches performs with small samples in the context of exploratory bifactor modeling. In the current study, a comprehensive simulation study was conducted to evaluate the small sample behavior of the two approaches in terms of bifactor structure recovery under different sample size, factor loading, number of variables per factor, number of factors, and factor correlation experimental conditions. The results show that REFA is recommended for use over ULS-FA, particularly in the conditions involving low factor loadings, few group factors, or a small number of variables per factor.
Related Concept Videos
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Factorial Design
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Compacting Factor test
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
One-Way ANOVA

