[Comparative study on three implantation approaches of the totally implantable venous access ports using dual-guided...

Objective: To compare the clinical application effect of totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAP) via the internal jugular vein,the subclavian vein and the brachiocephalic veins under the guidance of ultrasound combined with DSA. Methods: The clinical materials of 346 patients (162 males and 184 females) who implanted TIVAP in intervention Department of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital between August 2018 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and the average age was (57±12) years (17 to 83 years). The patients were divided into three groups according to the different implantation approaches. One hundred and twenty-six patients (67 males and 59 females) were group A who implanted from the internal jugular vein and the average age was (52±11) years,114 patients (52 males and 62 females) were group B who implanted from the subclavian vein and the average age was (58±10) years,106 patients (43 males and 63 females) were group C who implanted from the brachiocephalic vein and the average age was (60±9) years.The first-puncture success rate,operating time,implanting length,intraoperative pain score, one month comfort rating after surgery, unscheduled decannulation rates, early and late complication rates were compared among three groups. Results: All the patients implanted the TIVAP successfully.There were no significant differences about the first-puncture success rate (χ(2)=1.375,P=0.503),operating time (F=0.968, P=0.624), unscheduled decannulation rates (χ(2)=1.570, P=0.456), and the total pipe length among the three groups (F=0.821, P=0.441),while the catheter length inside the blood vessel were the shortest in group C (F= 263.618, P=0.000), and the one month comfort rating after surgery of group C were higher compared with group A and B (F=52.248,P=0.000).Pitch-off syndrome was a unique complication of group B (χ(2)=6.159,P=0.046) and other complications were no significant differences (P>0.05). Conclusion: There are high accuracy and safety among three implantation approaches,and the approach via brachiocephalic vein under the guidance of ultrasound combined with DSA is more comfortable and lower complication rates, which could be priority to choose.