Development of the "POP" scoring system for predicting obstetric and gynecological diseases in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 22, 2025

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse POP Quantification System
Published on: September 20, 2018
Asami Okada1,2, Yohei Okada3,4, Hiroyuki Fujita3
1Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Japanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital, 602-8026, Haruobicho 355-5, Kamigyo, Kyoto, Japan. asami.tsuji0515@gmail.com.
Background:
Obstetric and gynecological (OBGY) diseases are among the most important differential diagnoses for young women with acute abdominal pain. However, there are few established clinical prediction rules for screening OBGY diseases in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to develop a prediction model for diagnosing OBGY diseases in the ED.
Methods:
This single-center retrospective cohort study included female patients with acute abdominal pain who presented to our ED. We developed a logistic regression model for predicting OBGY diseases and assessed its diagnostic ability. This study included young female patients aged between 16 and 49 years who had abdominal pain and were examined at the ED between April 2017 and March 2018. Trauma patients and patients who were referred from other hospitals or from the OBGY department of our hospital were excluded.
Results:
Out of 27,991 patients, 740 were included. Sixty-five patients were diagnosed with OBGY diseases (8.8%). The "POP" scoring system (past history of OBGY diseases + 1, no other symptoms + 1, and peritoneal irritation signs + 1) was developed. Cut-off values set between 0 and 1 points, sensitivity at 0.97, specificity at 0.39, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.1 (95% CI: 0.02-0.31) were considered to rule-out, while cut-off values set between 2 and 3 points, sensitivity at 0.23 (95% CI 0.13-0.33), specificity at 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00), and positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 17.30 (95% CI: 7.88-37.99) were considered to rule-in.
Conclusions:
Our "POP" scoring system may be useful for screening OBGY diseases in the ED. Further research is necessary to assess the predictive performance and external validity of different data sets.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...

