Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 22, 2025

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
Published on: February 6, 2021
Codebook for rating clinical communication skills based on the Calgary-Cambridge Guide
Else Dalsgaard Iversen1,2,3, Maiken Overbeck Wolderslund4,5, Poul-Erik Kofoed6
1Health Services Research Unit, Lillebaelt Hospital, Beriderbakken 4, DK-7100, Vejle, Denmark. else.iversen@rsyd.dk.
The Observation Scheme-12, a tool for rating clinical communication skills, was validated using a codebook. It demonstrated acceptable reliability for assessing communication skills based on the Calgary-Cambridge Guide.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Communication Skills Assessment
- Health Professions Education
Background:
- Clinical communication skills are crucial for effective patient care.
- Existing tools for assessing these skills require validation for reliability and objectivity.
- The Observation Scheme-12 was developed as a potential measurement tool.
Purpose of the Study:
- To confirm the validity and reliability of the Observation Scheme-12.
- To operationalize the Observation Scheme-12 into a detailed rating tool.
- To establish the objectivity and consistency of the assessment tool.
Main Methods:
- The study involved operationalizing the Observation Scheme-12's 5-point scale into a codebook with specific micro-skills.
- Audio recordings of clinical interactions were used.
- Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess interrater and intrarater reliability.
Main Results:
- A validated rating tool with 12 items was developed, each detailing 0-5 micro-skills.
- The codebook provided criteria for ratings from 0-4 based on micro-skill accomplishment.
- Overall score ICCs were 0.74 (interrater) and 0.86 (intrarater); 10 of 12 items had ICCs > 0.5.
Conclusions:
- A supplementary codebook enhances the objectivity and reliability of the Observation Scheme-12.
- The Observation Scheme-12, with its codebook, provides acceptable reliability for assessing clinical communication.
- The tool is suitable for evaluating communication skills aligned with the Calgary-Cambridge Guide.
Related Concept Videos
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Communication
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Therapeutic Communication
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...

