Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026
Protocol for Mosquito Rearing A. gambiae
Published on: July 4, 2007
An overview of malarial Anopheles mosquito survival estimates in relation to methodology
Justin Matthews1,2, Alison Bethel3,4, Goldie Osei3
1College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. j.n.matthews@exeter.ac.uk.
Background:
The transmission of malaria is known to be sensitive to the survival (longevity, mortality) of its mosquito vector, yet there have been few reviews of estimates of this important population parameter in the malaria-carrying genus Anopheles.
Methods:
We carried out a systematic search for and meta-analysis of survival estimates, framed around the methods of estimation, under the major groupings of ‛vertical' (based on stable age or stage frequencies), ‛horizontal' (based on recaptures of marked and released cohorts), and ‛parasitological' (proportion of infectious mosquitoes). Because of the intricacies of the estimation process we provide an outline of these methods.
Results:
By meta-analysis we quantify the average of the distribution of daily survival [Formula: see text] for vertical (0.83, 95% CI: 0.80-0.86), horizontal (0.73, 95% CI: 0.66-0.79) and parasitological (0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.95) methods.
Conclusions:
The meta-analysis demonstrates the anticipated result that horizontal estimates are lowest because they estimate apparent survival (survival and non-emigration) rather than true survival. On the other hand, vertical methods make strong assumptions about the stability or stationarity of the underlying populations. Further potential sources of methodological bias are mentioned. The substantial differences in estimates between methods indicates that methodological biases need to be considered when making use of available survival estimates.
