Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 22, 2025

07:46
Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
Published on: August 9, 2024
1.1K
[Extended reality technologies for support of surgical workflows]
Christoph Rüger1, Simon Moosburner1, Igor M Sauer2,3
1Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte|Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Experimentelle Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Summary
Extended reality (XR) shows promise for improving surgical workflows and patient outcomes. While practical applications in training and planning are emerging, further research is needed to confirm effectiveness and cost-efficiency in clinical settings.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Innovation
- Medical Technology
- Extended Reality Applications
Background:
- Extended reality (XR) technologies are rapidly advancing, nearing clinical feasibility.
- Current XR applications in surgery focus on training, preoperative planning, and intraoperative assistance.
- Existing XR products are available, with some holding clinical approval.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the potential of XR in optimizing surgical workflows, time efficiency, and postoperative outcomes.
- To assess the current state and future prospects of XR in surgical training, planning, and assistance.
- To identify research gaps, particularly in cost-effectiveness and high-quality clinical evaluations of XR in surgery.
Main Methods:
- Review of current developments and existing products in XR for surgical applications.
- Analysis of feasibility studies and initial assessments in teaching and preoperative planning.
- Identification of a lack of comprehensive evaluation studies for intraoperative use and cost-effectiveness.
Main Results:
- XR demonstrates practical utility in surgical teaching and offers advantages in preoperative planning, though technical limitations exist.
- Clinical evaluation studies for intraoperative XR use are largely absent, hindering meaningful assessment.
- A significant gap in cost-effectiveness assessments across all three surgical application areas was identified.
Conclusions:
- XR technologies offer proven benefits for surgical workflows, despite the current lack of extensive high-quality clinical validation.
- Further development of effective interaction concepts for XR in surgery is necessary.
- Continued research and technological advancements are anticipated to enhance XR's role in clinical practice.

