Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Confocal Time Lapse Imaging as an Efficient Method for the Cytocompatibility Evaluation of Dental Composites
Published on: November 9, 2014
How we are assessing the developing antibacterial resin-based dental materials? A scoping review
Maria Salem Ibrahim1, Isadora Martini Garcia2, Anmar Kensara3
1Ph.D. Program in Dental Biomedical Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; MPH Program, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 34212, Saudi Arabia.
This review highlights the need for better study designs to assess antibacterial additives in dental materials. Current research often lacks complexity and standardization, requiring cautious interpretation of results.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Antimicrobial Research
- Biomaterials Engineering
Background:
- Resin-based restorative dental materials are widely used in dentistry.
- Incorporating antibacterial additives aims to enhance their clinical performance by inhibiting bacterial growth.
- Standardized and reliable methods for evaluating these materials' efficacy are crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically identify and assess antibacterial additives used in resin-based dental materials.
- To evaluate the methodologies employed in screening and assessing the antibacterial activity of these materials.
- To identify gaps and limitations in current research approaches.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature review guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework.
- Searches conducted across Medline (OVID), EMBASE, and Scopus databases.
- Data extraction included additive type, material, assessment methods, and biofilm characteristics.
Main Results:
- 153 studies were included after screening 6503 initial records.
- Quaternary ammonium monomers were the most common additive (45%), with resin composites being the primary material (49%).
- Significant methodological heterogeneity and high risk of bias were noted, particularly in sample size, blinding, outcome assessment, and biofilm maturity.
Conclusions:
- Current in vitro studies on antibacterial additives in dental materials show promising results but require cautious interpretation.
- There is an urgent need for improved study designs that better mimic the oral environment.
- Standardized methods are essential for accurate evaluation and optimization of these advanced dental materials.
More Related Videos
08:20Systematic Approach to Identify Novel Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Molecules from Plants' Extracts and Fractions to Prevent Dental Caries
Published on: March 31, 2021
05:42Detection and Removal of Tooth-Colored Composite Resin Using the Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique
Published on: July 27, 2022