Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging
Published on: November 8, 2012
Brain Structural Connectivity Predicts Brain Functional Complexity: Diffusion Tensor Imaging Derived Centrality
Josh Neudorf1, Chelsea Ekstrand1, Shaylyn Kress1
1Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Dr., Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada.
Abstract:
The complexity of brain activity has recently been investigated using the Hurst exponent (H), which describes the extent to which functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) activity is simple vs. complex. For example, research has demonstrated that fMRI activity is more complex before than after consumption of alcohol and during task than resting state. The measurement of H in fMRI is a novel method that requires the investigation of additional factors contributing to complexity. Graph theory metrics of centrality can assess how centrally important to the brain network each region is, based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) counts of probabilistic white matter (WM) tracts. DTI derived centrality was hypothesized to account for the complexity of functional activity, based on the supposition that more sources of information to integrate should result in more complex activity. FMRI BOLD complexity as measured by H was associated with five brain region centrality measures: degree, eigenvector, PageRank, current flow betweenness, and current flow closeness centrality. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that eigenvector centrality was the most robust predictor of complexity, whereby greater centrality was associated with increased complexity (lower H). Regions known to be highly connected, including the thalamus and hippocampus, notably were among the highest in centrality and complexity. This research has led to a greater understanding of how brain region characteristics such as DTI centrality relate to the novel Hurst exponent approach for assessing brain activity complexity, and implications for future research that employ these measures are discussed.

