Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Statistical Fragility of Saline Nasal Irrigation for Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Dermal Metastasis From Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

The Laryngoscope·2025
Same author

Statistical Fragility of Steroid-Antiviral Therapy for Bell's Palsy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2025
Same author

Free Flap Surgery and Oncologic Care of the Pregnant Head and Neck Cancer Patient.

Head & neck·2025
Same author

Pectoral-Sparing Deltoid Artery Use in the Vessel-Depleted Neck: A Pictorial Essay.

Head & neck·2025
Same author

Early Feeding After Free Flap Reconstruction for Oral Cavity Cancer: A Single Institution Retrospective Review.

Microsurgery·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction
06:32

Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction

Published on: December 5, 2025

278

Palatomaxillary Reconstruction: Fibula or Scapula.

Arvind K Badhey1, Mohemmed N Khan1

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Seminars in Plastic Surgery
|May 12, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Reconstructing the palatomaxillary area is complex. This review compares fibula and scapula free tissue transfers, detailing their pros and cons for midface reconstruction.

Keywords:
fibula free flapmicrovascular reconstructionpalatomaxillary reconstructionscapula free flap

More Related Videos

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.4K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction
06:32

Coronoid-Temporalis Pedicled Flap for Orbital Floor Defect Reconstruction

Published on: December 5, 2025

278
Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
08:01

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach

Published on: August 24, 2018

9.4K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Head and Neck Reconstruction
  • Plastic Surgery

Background:

  • Palatomaxillary reconstruction is challenging due to the vital functions of the maxillofacial skeleton.
  • Defects impact mastication, airway, and midface aesthetics.
  • Free tissue transfer is a standard reconstructive approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of fibula and scapula free tissue transfers.
  • To specifically evaluate their utility in palatomaxillary reconstruction.
  • To aid reconstructive surgeons in selecting optimal bony reconstruction options.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review focusing on fibula and scapula free flaps for midface reconstruction.
  • Analysis of functional and aesthetic outcomes.
  • Comparison of surgical techniques and donor site morbidity.

Main Results:

  • Both fibula and scapula flaps offer viable options for palatomaxillary reconstruction.
  • Each flap has distinct advantages and disadvantages regarding contour, bulk, and donor site considerations.
  • Selection depends on the specific defect and surgeon's expertise.

Conclusions:

  • Fibula and scapula free flaps are primary choices for bony reconstruction in the midface.
  • Understanding their specific benefits and drawbacks is crucial for successful palatomaxillary reconstruction.
  • Tailored flap selection optimizes functional and aesthetic results.