Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

281
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
281
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of risk on intertemporal choice and preference reversal.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2022
Same author

Is low cost really conducive to primary care utilisation: An empirical analysis of community health centers in China.

Health & social care in the community·2021
Same author

How Much Sugar is in My Drink? The Power of Visual Cues.

Nutrients·2020
Same author

Hunger increases delay discounting of food and non-food rewards.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2019
Same author

Unpacking decision difficulty: Testing action dynamics in Intertemporal, gamble, and consumer choices.

Acta psychologica·2018
Same author

Nutrient-specific system versus full fact panel: Testing the benefits of nutrient-specific front-of-package labels in a student sample.

Appetite·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 21, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K

Waiting in intertemporal choice tasks affects discounting and subjective time perception.

Ping Xu1, Claudia González-Vallejo2, Benjamin T Vincent3

  • 1School of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|May 12, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new delay discounting task with real waiting periods. Results show that actual waiting increases discounting and alters time perception compared to deferred waiting.

More Related Videos

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.9K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 21, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.0K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.9K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Human delay discounting research often lacks real waiting periods.
  • Waiting can be perceived as aversive, influencing decision-making.
  • Existing models may not fully capture the impact of immediate vs. deferred waiting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a novel delay discounting paradigm incorporating actual waiting.
  • To investigate how real waiting influences delay discounting behavior and subjective time perception.
  • To explore the magnitude effect and gain-loss asymmetry within this new paradigm.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel delay discounting task with immediate waiting periods.
  • Employed hierarchical Bayesian modeling to analyze discounting and time perception mechanisms.
  • Conducted two experiments comparing real waiting vs. deferred waiting conditions.

Main Results:

  • The real-time waiting task led to significantly greater discounting.
  • Nonlinear (convex) time perception was observed during the online waiting task.
  • Discounting parameters correlated with preference reversals regarding waiting.

Conclusions:

  • Subjective time perception is crucial in intertemporal choices, alongside discounting tendencies.
  • Novel paradigms with actual waiting are essential for understanding delay discounting.
  • Findings challenge traditional models by highlighting the impact of immediate aversive waiting.