Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025
06:53
3D Whole-heart Myocardial Tissue Analysis
Published on: April 12, 2017
9.2K
Response to Commentary by Adriaan van Es.
1Associate Professor, Taylor's University School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, 1, Jalan Taylor, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, MALAYSIA.
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics
|May 13, 2020
Summary
This article clarifies that penal amputation arguments are abhorrent in liberal societies. It explores ethical considerations in diverse cultural and religious contexts, emphasizing differing value systems.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Sociology of Religion
Background:
- Dr. Adriaan Van Es provided commentary on a previous article concerning penal amputation.
- A misunderstanding arose regarding the author's stance on penal amputation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify the author's position on penal amputation.
- To address ethical considerations of penal amputation in diverse societal contexts.
Main Methods:
- Ethical analysis of penal amputation arguments.
- Comparative discussion of societal values and religious beliefs.
Main Results:
- The author unequivocally rejects penal amputation in liberal societies.
- Ethical justifications for penal amputation are deemed abhorrent in secular contexts.
Conclusions:
- The author and Dr. Van Es share common ground in opposing penal amputation in liberal societies.
- Further consideration is needed for ethical frameworks in less secular societies with differing value systems.
