Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Chart OR Theme, Depending on Epistemology: Embracing Methodological Shifting
Lara Varpio1,2
1Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, US.
Abstract:
In this commentary, I argue that the injunction to "chart, don't theme" in scoping reviews needs revision because the methodology has experienced methodological shifting. This means that the, scoping review methodology has evolved because it has moved across epistemological traditions. I contend that charting is methodologically coherent for scoping reviews conducted from an objectivist epistemology, whereas reflexive thematic analysis is coherent for scoping reviews conducted from a subjectivist epistemology. I conclude that researchers should make their epistemological stance explicit and select analytic practices that align with that stance. In summation, I suggest reframing the methodological choice as "chart or theme, depending on epistemology."
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood
Schemata: Building Blocks of Knowledge
Schemata...
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security: