Related Experiment Videos
Bulimics and restrained eaters: a personality comparison
1Dept. of Psychology, University of Illinois, Chicago 60680.
Addictive Behaviors
|January 1, 1988
Summary
Restrained eaters and individuals with bulimia nervosa share body dissatisfaction and narcissistic traits. However, bulimics exhibit psychopathology absent in restrained eaters, who perceive themselves as more morally virtuous.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Eating Disorders
Background:
- Restrained eating and bulimia nervosa are complex eating disorders.
- Understanding the psychological underpinnings of these conditions is crucial for effective intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the psychological characteristics of restrained eaters and individuals with bulimia nervosa.
- To identify shared and distinct psychological features between these two groups.
Main Methods:
- 136 female undergraduates completed several psychological scales.
- Scales included measures for restraint, bulimia, narcissistic personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, body image, and self-concept.
- Stepwise regression analyses were employed to identify predictor variables.
Main Results:
- Both restrained eaters and individuals with bulimia nervosa reported body dissatisfaction and narcissistic qualities.
- Physical self-esteem and narcissism were significant predictors for both groups.
- Bulimia nervosa was associated with general maladjustment, while restrained eating was linked to moral self-esteem.
Conclusions:
- While sharing body dissatisfaction and narcissism, bulimia nervosa is distinguished by psychopathology.
- Restrained eaters exhibit a perception of moral virtue not seen in bulimic individuals.