Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025
Minimal Invasive Resection of Large Retrosternal Thyroid Goiter
Published on: September 20, 2024
Meta-analysis of subxiphoid approach versus lateral approach for thoracoscopic Thymectomy
Jiaduo Li1, Guoyan Qi2, Yaling Liu3
1Center of Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis Hebei Province, First Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Fangbei road No. 9, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei Province, China.
Background:
Compared with traditional open surgery for thymectomy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) reduces hospital stay, decreases postoperative pain, and recovers faster. VATS has become increasingly popular in the past decade. VATS techniques to perform a thymectomy include subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SVATS) or lateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (LVATS). In this study, our objective was to systematically review on VATS thymectomy and draw a meta-analysis on the outcomes between the two approaches.
Methods:
We searched online databases and identified studies from database inception to 2019 that compared SVATS to LVATS thymectomy. Study endpoints included operative time, operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative pleural drainage, postoperative complications, conversion to open, oncologic outcomes.
Results:
Four hundred seventy-one patients were included in this study, for which 200 and 271 patients underwent SVATS and LVATS thymectomy, respectively. Patients in the SVATS group had significantly less operative time, operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were identified. There was no statistical difference in postoperative pleural drainage, conversion to open and oncologic outcomes. No hospital deaths were recorded for either procedure.
Conclusions:
While randomized controlled studies are required to make definitive conclusions, this meta-analysis suggests that SVATS thymectomy is safe and can achieve good and safe operative and perioperative outcomes similar or better to LVATS thymectomy.
