Related Experiment Videos
Control of oral anticoagulant therapy
1St. Joseph's Hospital, Tampa, FL 33607.
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science
|November 1, 1988
Summary
The International Normalized Ratio (INR) standardizes oral anticoagulant therapy control, minimizing lab variations. However, many patients exceed recommended levels, increasing hemorrhage risk.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Hematology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Oral anticoagulant therapy requires standardized monitoring for efficacy and safety.
- Variability in prothrombin time testing can lead to inconsistent therapeutic outcomes.
- Recent data suggest a high incidence of over-anticoagulation in American patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) in standardizing oral anticoagulant therapy.
- To assess the impact of INR on interlaboratory comparisons.
- To identify the prevalence of supratherapeutic anticoagulation levels in a patient population.
Main Methods:
- Reporting prothrombin time as INR.
- Calibrating local thromboplastin with an International Reference Preparation.
- Analyzing patient specimen results against recommended therapeutic ranges.
Main Results:
- The INR effectively minimized discrepancies caused by variations in thromboplastin sources and instrumentation.
- The INR facilitates improved interlaboratory comparability of coagulation test results.
- Over 40% of analyzed patient specimens exhibited INR values exceeding currently recommended therapeutic levels.
Conclusions:
- The INR is a valuable tool for standardizing oral anticoagulant therapy monitoring.
- Implementation of INR reporting can enhance the reliability and consistency of coagulation testing.
- A significant proportion of patients are potentially at increased risk of bleeding due to over-anticoagulation.