Differential responses to kinase inhibition in FGFR2-addicted triple negative breast cancer cells: a quantitative

Debbie L Cunningham1, Adil R Sarhan2,3, Andrew J Creese2,4

  • 1School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. d.cunningham@bham.ac.uk.

Scientific Reports
|May 16, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) signaling is crucial in triple-negative breast cancer. This study identifies new FGF-regulated targets and reveals flexible pathway architectures, offering insights into FGFR inhibitor resistance mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) signaling is frequently activated in cancer via diverse mechanisms.
  • Downstream signal transduction pathways of FGF signaling are not fully characterized.
  • Triple-negative breast cancer cell lines MFM223 and SUM52 show amplified FGF receptor 2 (FGFR2) expression and depend on FGFR2 signaling for viability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify FGF-regulated phosphorylation events in FGFR2-amplified triple-negative breast cancer cells.
  • To characterize the downstream signal transduction pathways involved in FGF-dependent cancer.
  • To investigate mechanisms of intrinsic resistance to FGFR2 inhibition.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative differential phosphoproteomics using Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino acids in Cell culture (SILAC).
  • Comparative Gene Ontology (GO) proteome analysis.
  • Inhibition of FGFR2 kinase activity using SU5402.

Main Results:

  • Identified numerous FGF-regulated phosphorylation events in MFM223 and SUM52 cells.
  • SUM52 cells showed enrichment in cell metabolism proteins, while MFM223 cells were enriched in cell adhesion and migration proteins.
  • FGFR2 inhibition impacted a significant fraction of the phosphoproteome, revealing both shared and divergent responses in canonical RAF/MAPK/ERK/RSK and PI3K/AKT/PDK/mTOR/S6K pathways.
  • Observed inhibition of phosphorylation-dependent negative-feedback pathways, suggesting mechanisms of intrinsic resistance.

Conclusions:

  • This study expands the understanding of FGF signaling in triple-negative breast cancer.
  • Identified novel targets for functional investigation within FGF signaling pathways.
  • Revealed the flexible architecture of FGF signaling pathways and elucidated mechanisms of intrinsic resistance to FGFR2 inhibition.
  • Findings have implications for the therapeutic application of FGFR inhibitors, highlighting common and divergent responses and drug resistance pathways.