Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
Different Microcirculation Response Between Culprit and Non-Culprit Vessels in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Yoon-Sung Jo1,2, Hyeyeon Moon1,2, Kyungil Park1,2
1Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center Dong-A University Hospital Busan South Korea.
Insights
Microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome primarily affects the culprit vessel, showing improvement over time. Non-culprit vessels remain unaffected, indicating localized impairment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is often associated with microvascular dysfunction.
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard treatment for ACS.
- The differential impact of microvascular dysfunction on culprit versus non-culprit coronary vessels post-PCI requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare microvascular dysfunction between culprit and non-culprit coronary vessels in ACS patients after PCI.
- To assess the temporal changes in microvascular function in these vessels over a 6-month follow-up period.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 115 ACS patients undergoing successful PCI.
- Intracoronary hemodynamic measurements and 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) at baseline and 6-month follow-up.
- Calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) for both culprit and non-culprit vessels.
Main Results:
- Culprit vessels demonstrated lower FFR and CFR compared to non-culprit vessels at baseline and follow-up.
- Index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) differed at baseline but not at 6 months.
- Resistance to stenosis was significantly higher in culprit vessels under both resting and hyperemic conditions.
- In culprit vessels, FFR and IMR decreased, while CFR increased at 6-month follow-up; non-culprit vessels showed no significant changes.
Conclusions:
- Microvascular dysfunction in ACS is predominantly localized to the culprit vessel territory during the acute phase.
- Significant recovery of microvascular function occurs in the culprit vessel territory by 6 months post-PCI.
- There is no evidence of microvascular dysfunction involvement in non-culprit coronary territories in ACS patients.
Abstract:
Background This study investigated whether the microvascular dysfunction differed between culprit and non-culprit vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results In 115 prospectively recruited patients, after successful percutaneous coronary intervention, culprit and non-culprit intracoronary hemodynamic measurements were performed and repeated at 6-month follow-up. 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography was performed at 6-month follow-up visit to determine absolute myocardial blood flow. The resistance values of each vessel were calculated using the coronary pressure data and the myocardial blood flow values obtained from 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography data. We compared the measurements between culprit and non-culprit vessels and assessed changes in microvascular dysfunction during the study period. In 334 vessels (115 culprit and 219 non-culprit), the culprit vessel group showed a lower fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve than the non-culprit vessel group at baseline and 6-month follow-up, respectively. The value of index of microcirculatory resistance was different between the 2 groups in the baseline but not at 6-month follow-up. The microvascular resistance at rest and hyperemic microvascular resistance were not different between the 2 groups, but resistance to stenosis was higher in the culprit vessel group, under both resting and hyperemic status (P=0.02 and P<0.01, respectively). In the culprit vessel analysis, the fractional flow reserve and index of microcirculatory resistance decreased whereas coronary flow reserve increased (P<0.01 for all) at 6-month follow-up. However, there was no change in index of microcirculatory resistance, coronary flow reserve, and fractional flow reserve from baseline to 6-month follow-up in the non-culprit vessel analysis. Conclusions The observed microvascular dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome is limited to the culprit vessel territory in the acute phase, which is relatively recovered in the chronic phase and there is no out-of-culprit territory involvement. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04169516.
More Related Videos
10:03Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
08:51Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
Published on: September 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology