Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
Published on: November 30, 2022
Developing model biobanking consent language: what matters to prospective participants?
Laura M Beskow1, Catherine M Hammack-Aviran2, Kathleen M Brelsford2
1Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 400, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA. laura.m.beskow@vanderbilt.edu.
Developing model consent language for genomic research, informed by public input, helps individuals align participation decisions with their values. This research provides insights into public perceptions of biobanking and genomic studies.
Area of Science:
- Genomic Research
- Bioethics
- Public Health
Background:
- Informed consent is crucial for genomic research, requiring clear communication of risks and benefits.
- Large-scale genomic studies present unique opportunities and risks for participants, families, and communities.
- Effective consent materials must facilitate understanding of participation reasons.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop model consent language and values-based questions for genomic research using empirical data.
- To assess public understanding and concerns regarding biobanking and genomic study participation.
- To enhance the alignment of participation decisions with individual values.
Main Methods:
- Conducted in-person interviews with a diverse sample (n=32) of the general population.
- Gathered preliminary input on model consent materials and values questions.
- Assessed participant reactions to specific consent disclosures and hypothetical willingness to participate.
Main Results:
- Reassuring information included biobank purpose, oversight committees, privacy protection, and controlled data access.
- Concerning information involved public data deposition, unintended access risks, non-research data use, and medical record utilization.
- Initial willingness to participate was 75%, decreasing to 66% after detailed consideration; values questions were rated as helpful.
Conclusions:
- Model consent language effectively captures public perspectives on biobanking and genomic studies.
- Qualitative data reveals specific concerns and reassurances influencing participation decisions.
- Interventions promoting engagement with consent information can lead to value-aligned participation choices.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Legal Guidelines for Documentation

