Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Cognitive aids with roles defined (CARD) for obstetrical crises: a multisite before-and-after cohort study
Sylvain Boet1,2,3, Glenn Posner4,5,6, Erika Bariciak7
1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M2, Canada. sboet@toh.on.ca.
Insights
The cognitive aids with roles defined (CARD) did not improve outcomes for emergency Cesarean deliveries. This study found no significant changes in delivery time or maternal/neonatal clinical results after implementing CARD.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Healthcare Management
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Effective teamwork is crucial for managing obstetrical emergencies.
- Cognitive aids can support interprofessional team coordination during crises.
- The Cognitive Aids with Roles Defined (CARD) tool aims to improve crisis management in healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical impact of implementing the CARD cognitive aid during emergency Cesarean deliveries.
- To assess if CARD improves time-based and clinical outcomes in high-risk obstetrical situations.
Main Methods:
- A prospective before-and-after cohort trial was conducted across two Canadian academic hospital maternity units.
- One campus received training on CARD (intervention), while the other did not (control).
- Data from 267 emergency Cesarean deliveries were analyzed, focusing on time to delivery and maternal/neonatal clinical outcomes.
Main Results:
- Implementation of CARD did not significantly alter the median time to delivery for emergency Cesarean sections (17 vs. 15 minutes).
- No significant improvements were observed in secondary outcomes, including specific time intervals or clinical results for mothers and newborns.
- Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods (P = 0.36).
Conclusions:
- The CARD cognitive aid did not demonstrate a significant benefit in improving time-based or clinical outcomes for emergency Cesarean deliveries.
- Further research may be needed to explore alternative or modified cognitive aids for obstetrical crisis management.
Purpose:
Patient outcome during an obstetrical emergency depends on prompt coordination of an interprofessional team. The cognitive aids with roles defined (CARD) is a cognitive aid that addresses the issue of teamwork in crisis management. This study evaluated the clinical impact of implementing the CARD cognitive aid during emergency Cesarean deliveries.
Methods:
We conducted a prospective before-and-after cohort trial at the maternity units of two Canadian academic hospital campuses. Both sites received didactic online training regarding teamwork during crises, which involved training on using CARD for the "CARD" campus (intervention) and no mention of CARD at the "no CARD" campus (control). The primary outcome was the total time to delivery after the call for an emergency Cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included specific intervals of time within the time to delivery and clinical outcomes for both the babies and mothers.
Results:
We analyzed data from 267 eligible emergency Cesarean deliveries that occurred between January 11 2014 and December 31 2017. The use of CARD did not significantly change the median [interquartile range] time to delivery of the baby during an emergency Cesarean delivery from the pre-intervention to the post-intervention time period (17 [12-28] vs 15 [13-20], respectively; median difference, 2; 95% confidence interval, -1 to 5; P = 0.36). The clinical outcomes for the baby or the mother and other secondary outcomes also did not change.
Conclusions:
The CARD cognitive aid did not significantly improve time-based or clinical maternal and neonatal outcomes of emergency Cesarean delivery at our academic maternity unit.
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

