Stress During Virtual Reality and High-Fidelity Simulation in Anesthesia Trainees: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Manikin-based high-fidelity simulation (HFS) is critical in anesthesia for teaching crisis resource management skills in a safe environment. However, HFS is known to result in significant stress, potentially affecting learning. Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising alternative to HFS, but the impact on stress remains unknown. This study compares perceived and physiological stress in anesthesia trainees during VR and HFS, and in high- and low-performing subjects after HFS.

This secondary analysis from a prospective, sequential, randomized controlled trial compares anesthesia trainee volunteers who undergo either VR or HFS scenarios. Perceived stress was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Medical Emotion Scale (MES), and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Physiological stress was assessed via heart rate variability standard deviation between successive N-N intervals (SDNN) and the low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF) ratio. Trainees' performance was assessed with the Ottawa Global Rating Scale.

Among the 34 volunteers enrolled, both the VR and HFS groups demonstrated similar STAI, MES, and NASA-TLX scores following the scenarios. However, VR elicited lower SDNN values (mean difference, -12, 95% CI, -23 to -1.0, P=0.034), but not the LF/HF ratio. No difference was observed in stress indicators between high-performing and low-performing trainees.

Anesthesia trainees experience comparable levels of perceived stress in the form of anxiety, emotional responses, and task load in VR and HFS scenarios. A lower heart rate variability during VR scenarios may indicate greater physiological stress. The relevance and implications of these findings in simulation require further clarification.

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05041049).