Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
Published on: December 15, 2023
Discordant Values in Lower Extremity Physiologic Studies Predict Increased Cardiovascular Risk
Christine Firth1, Andrew S Tseng2, Mina Abdelmalek1
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Scottsdale AZ.
Insights
Discordant ankle-brachial indexes (ABI) indicate higher cardiovascular risk. Examining all four ankle artery readings is crucial for accurate peripheral arterial disease assessment and patient risk stratification.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Medicine
- Cardiovascular Diagnostics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a key noninvasive tool for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and assessing cardiovascular risk.
- Standard ABI calculation uses the highest systolic blood pressure from four ankle arteries (dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial, bilaterally).
- Discordant ABI results, where some readings are normal and others abnormal, may underestimate cardiovascular risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between discordant ABI results and cardiovascular outcomes.
- To determine if discordant ABIs predict a higher risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality compared to concordant normal ABIs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of patients undergoing ABI measurement between January 1996 and June 2018.
- Included patients with initially normal ABI range (1.00-1.39).
- Compared outcomes between patients with all four normal ABIs (n=15,577) and those with at least one abnormal ABI (≤0.99) (n=2095).
Main Results:
- Patients with discordant ABIs were more likely to be older, female, smokers, and have comorbidities like CKD, CAD, diabetes, COPD, hypertension, or prior stroke.
- Discordant ABIs were significantly associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction (HR 1.31), ischemic stroke (HR 1.53), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.27), even after adjusting for comorbidities.
Conclusions:
- Discordant ABI results are linked to elevated risks of major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality.
- Clinicians should analyze ABI calculations from all four ankle arteries to accurately identify patients at higher cardiovascular risk.
Abstract:
Background Ankle-brachial indexes (ABI) are a noninvasive diagnostic tool for peripheral arterial disease and a marker of increased cardiovascular risk. ABI is calculated using the highest systolic blood pressure of the 4 ankle arteries (bilateral dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial). Accordingly, patients may be assigned a normal ABI when the result would be abnormal if calculated using one of the other blood pressure readings. Cardiovascular outcomes for patients with discordant ABIs are undescribed. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent ABI measurement for any indication between January 1996 and June 2018. Those with normal ABIs (1.00-1.39) were included. We compared patients with all 4 normal ABIs (calculated using all 4 ankle arteries; n=15 577, median age 64.0 years, 54.4% men) to those with discordant ABIs (at least 1 abnormal ABI ≤0.99; n=2095, median age 66.0 years, 47.8% men). The outcomes assessed were ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. Compared with patients with concordant normal ABIs, patients with discordant ABIs were older; women; smoked; and had chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, or prior stroke. Patients with discordant ABIs had a greater risk of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.10-1.56), ischemic stroke (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.37-1.72), and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16-1.39), including after adjustment for baseline comorbidities. Conclusions Discordant ABI results were associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality in the studied population. Clinicians should examine ABI calculations using all 4 ankle arteries to better characterize a patient's cardiovascular risk.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...

