Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

444
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
444
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

813
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
813
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

13.7K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
13.7K
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

645
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
645
Conservation of Declining Populations02:07

Conservation of Declining Populations

12.4K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
12.4K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

190
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
190

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional brain organization is stable within individuals across years.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Quality assessment and control of unprocessed anatomical, functional and diffusion MRI of the human brain using MRIQC.

Nature protocols·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Individual Brain Charting: fifth release of high-resolution fMRI data for cognitive mapping.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

SPM as a cornerstone of an open source software ecosystem for neuroimaging.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same author

Arbitrary stimuli are not devalued by stopping action: A registered replication of Wessel et al. (2014).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same journal

Non-canonical amino acid incorporation enables minimally disruptive labeling of stress granule and TDP-43 proteinopathy.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Analysis of dendritic input currents during place field dynamics.

eLife·2026
Same journal

TopoMetry systematically learns and evaluates the latent geometry of single-cell data.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Navigating the path: Advice to physician-scientists on choosing a clinical specialty.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Neural activity profiles reveal overlapping, intermingled subpopulations spanning area borders in mouse sensorimotor cortex.

eLife·2026
Same journal

The exquisite mechanics of a tsetse bite.

eLife·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 21, 2025

A User-friendly and Powerful R Analysis of Large-scale Datasets
10:56

A User-friendly and Powerful R Analysis of Large-scale Datasets

Published on: November 4, 2025

214

Dataset decay and the problem of sequential analyses on open datasets.

William Hedley Thompson1,2, Jessey Wright1,3, Patrick G Bissett1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.

Elife
|May 20, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Reusing open data for multiple statistical tests can inflate false positive rates. This study explores correction methods to mitigate errors in sequential hypothesis testing on shared datasets.

Keywords:
computational biologyhumanmeta-researchmultiple comparison correctionmultiple comparisonsneuroscienceopen datasequential testingsystems biology

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance
04:58

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance

Published on: December 13, 2024

3.7K
Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 21, 2025

A User-friendly and Powerful R Analysis of Large-scale Datasets
10:56

A User-friendly and Powerful R Analysis of Large-scale Datasets

Published on: November 4, 2025

214
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance
04:58

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Role of Repetitive DNA Misregulation in Cancer Initiation and Immunotherapy Resistance

Published on: December 13, 2024

3.7K
Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Data Science
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Open data initiatives promote data sharing and reuse.
  • Multiple statistical testing on the same dataset can lead to inflated Type I error rates (false positives).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate how sequential hypothesis testing by multiple researchers on a single dataset inflates error rates.
  • To discuss potential correction procedures for reducing false positives in such scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation studies to model sequential hypothesis testing on shared datasets.
  • Analysis of error rate inflation under various testing scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Sequential hypothesis testing significantly increases the probability of false positives.
  • The extent of error inflation is dependent on the number of tests and researchers.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers must be aware of the increased risk of false positives when reusing open datasets.
  • Developing and applying robust correction procedures is crucial for maintaining statistical integrity in data reuse.