Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Differences in guideline-recommended heart failure medication between Dutch heart failure clinics: an analysis of the
G C M Linssen1, J F Veenis2, H P Brunner-La Rocca3
1Department of Cardiology, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo and Hengelo, Almelo, The Netherlands. g.linssen@zgt.nl.
Insights
Heart failure medication adherence varied significantly across Dutch clinics, impacting patient outcomes. Guideline-recommended drug prescription rates and dosages differed, highlighting a need for standardized care in heart failure treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Pharmacy
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) is a condition with significant morbidity and mortality.
- Guideline adherence in HF management is crucial for optimizing patient prognosis and serves as a quality benchmark.
- Variations in HF care quality can impact patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the utilization of guideline-recommended heart failure (HF) medications across different HF outpatient clinics in the Netherlands.
- To identify variations in prescription rates and dosages of key HF drugs among Dutch HF clinics.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional analysis of 8,360 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from the CHECK-HF registry (2013-2016).
- Data collected from 34 Dutch outpatient HF clinics.
- Focused on comparing prescription rates and dosages of medications including beta-blockers, RAS inhibitors, MRAs, ivabradine, and diuretics.
Main Results:
- Significant variations were observed in the prescription rates of guideline-recommended HF medications, with ranges for beta-blockers (58.9-97.4%), RAS inhibitors (61.9-97.1%), and MRAs (29.9-86.8%).
- Prescribed dosages also differed significantly, with target dose achievement rates varying widely for beta-blockers (5.9-29.1%), RAS inhibitors (18.4-56.1%), and MRAs (13.2-60.6%).
- These disparities in medication use and dosing were not fully attributable to differences in patient characteristics.
Conclusions:
- Substantial inter-clinic variability exists in the prescription rates and dosages of guideline-recommended medications for HFrEF patients in the Netherlands.
- The observed differences suggest potential quality-of-care variations in HF management across outpatient clinics.
- Further investigation is warranted to understand the drivers of these variations and to promote standardized, evidence-based HF care.
Background:
Heart failure (HF) is associated with poor prognosis, high morbidity and mortality. The prognosis can be optimised by guideline adherence, which also can be used as a benchmark of quality of care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in use of HF medication between Dutch HF clinics.
Methods:
The current analysis was part of a cross-sectional registry of 10,910 chronic HF patients at 34 Dutch outpatient clinics in the period of 2013 until 2016 (CHECK-HF), and focused on the differences in prescription rates between the participating clinics in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Results:
A total of 8,360 HFrEF patients were included with a mean age of 72.3 ± 11.8 years (ranging between 69.1 ± 11.9 and 76.6 ± 10.0 between the clinics), 63.9% were men (ranging between 54.3 and 78.1%), 27.3% were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV (ranging between 8.8 and 62.1%) and the average estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 59.6 ± 24.6 ml/min (ranging between 45.7 ± 23.5 and 97.1 ± 16.5). The prescription rates ranged from 58.9-97.4% for beta blockers (p < 0.01), 61.9-97.1% for renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (p < 0.01), 29.9-86.8% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) (p < 0.01), 0.0-31.3% for ivabradine (p < 0.01) and 64.9-100.0% for diuretics (p < 0.01). Also, the percentage of patients who received the target dose differed significantly, 5.9-29.1% for beta blockers (p < 0.01), 18.4-56.1% for RAS inhibitors (p < 0.01) and 13.2-60.6% for MRAs (p < 0.01).
Conclusions:
The prescription rates and prescribed dosages of guideline-recommended medication differed significantly between HF outpatient clinics in the Netherlands, not fully explained by differences in patient profiles.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics

