Long-Term Arrhythmic Risk Assessment in Biopsy-Proven Myocarditis
Gemma Pelargonio1, Gaetano Pinnacchio2, Maria Lucia Narducci2
1Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Institute of Cardiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Insights
Patients with myocarditis receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) face a high risk of ventricular arrhythmias, even long after implantation. Electroanatomical mapping can help identify those most at risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Myocardial diseases
Background:
- The long-term risk of arrhythmias in patients with myocarditis is not well understood.
- Myocarditis can lead to significant cardiac electrical instability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the long-term risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with myocarditis who have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).
- To identify predictors of arrhythmic events in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- The study included 56 patients with biopsy-proven myocarditis who received an ICD.
- Data analyzed included clinical characteristics, biopsy findings, electroanatomic voltage mapping, and device interrogations.
- Follow-up averaged 74 months to detect arrhythmic events.
Main Results:
- 45% of patients experienced major ventricular arrhythmias requiring ICD intervention.
- Sustained ventricular tachycardia on admission and extent of low potential areas on mapping predicted events.
- A 10% cutoff for abnormal bipolar area at mapping showed 89% sensitivity and 85% specificity for predicting interventions.
Conclusions:
- Patients with myocarditis receiving an ICD have a high prevalence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.
- Arrhythmic risk persists long-term in myocarditis patients.
- Electroanatomical ventricular mapping is a valuable tool for identifying patients at elevated arrhythmic risk.
Objectives:
This study sought to assess long-term arrhythmic risk in patients with myocarditis who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).
Background:
The arrhythmic risk of patients with myocarditis overtime remains poorly known.
Methods:
The study enrolled 56 patients with biopsy-proven myocarditis who received an ICD for either primary (57%) or secondary prevention (43%) according to current guidelines. Clinical characteristics, biopsy findings, electrophysiological data from endocardial 3-dimensional electroanatomic voltage mapping, and device interrogation data were analyzed to detect arrhythmic events overtime. Coronary angiography excluded significant coronary artery disease in all patients.
Results:
At a mean follow-up of 74 ± 60 months (median 65 months), 25 (45%) patients had major ventricular arrhythmias treated by ICD intervention (76% being terminated by ICD shock and 24% by antitachyarrhythmia burst pacing). At multivariable analysis, the presence of sustained ventricular tachycardia on admission (hazard ratio: 13.0; 95% confidence interval: 2.0 to 35.0; p = 0.032) and the extension of the areas of low potentials at the bipolar endocardial mapping (hazard ratio: 1.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 1.37; p = 0.013) were the only independent predictors of appropriate ICD interventions. A cutoff value of 10% of abnormal bipolar area at electroanatomical ventricular mapping discriminated patients with appropriate ICD interventions with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 85%.
Conclusions:
The study demonstrates that the prevalence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in patients with myocarditis receiving an ICD according to current guidelines is high and the arrhythmic risk persists late overtime. Electroanatomical ventricular mapping may be a useful tool to identify patients at greater arrhythmic risk.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Myocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Myocarditis I: Introduction


