Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling01:26

Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling

718
During leveling, the Earth's curvature and atmospheric refraction introduce deviations in the line of sight from a true horizontal reference. When the line of sight is leveled, it remains perpendicular to the plumb line only at a single point. Beyond this, it deviates due to the Earth’s curvature, represented by the correction C. For a sight distance D, the deviation can be derived using the relationship:This relationship shows that the deviation increases quadratically with distance. Over a...
718
Focusing of Light in the Eye01:16

Focusing of Light in the Eye

4.9K
Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...
4.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In vitro optical characterization of the RayOne Galaxy spiral extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens using high-resolution Mach-Zehnder interferometry.

Biomedical optics express·2026
Same author

First Report of Circular Rainbow Glare After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same author

IOL power calculation in cataract surgery: closed-form sensitivities to biometric uncertainties.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same author

Evaluation of a New Algorithm-Based Approach in Subjective Refraction.

Journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

International consensuses and guidelines on clinical management of highly myopic cataracts: A two-round modified e-Delphi study by the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO) and the Asia-Pacific Myopia Society (APMS).

Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Dry Eye Disease: Perspectives of a Patient and Both US and UK Physicians.

Ophthalmology and therapy·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.5K

Using Artificial Intelligence and Novel Polynomials to Predict Subjective Refraction.

Radhika Rampat1, Guillaume Debellemanière1, Jacques Malet1

  • 1Foundation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospital, Paris, France.

Scientific Reports
|May 24, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Artificial intelligence accurately predicts subjective refraction using novel wavefront data. Machine learning models outperformed traditional methods, offering a potential new standard for objective refraction prediction.

More Related Videos

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

481
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
05:46

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity

Published on: September 20, 2024

700

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 20, 2025

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.5K
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

481
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
05:46

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity

Published on: September 20, 2024

700

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Optometry

Background:

  • Accurate refractive error assessment is crucial for vision correction.
  • Subjective refraction, while standard, can be time-consuming and influenced by patient responses.
  • Objective methods aim to provide faster and potentially more consistent refractive measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate artificial intelligence (AI) models for predicting subjective refraction from wavefront aberrometry data.
  • To utilize a novel polynomial decomposition basis for processing wavefront data.
  • To compare the AI model's performance against the paraxial matching method for spectacle correction.

Main Methods:

  • Wavefront aberrometry data from 3729 eyes were used to train three gradient boosted trees (XGBoost) algorithms.
  • Subjective refraction was converted into power vectors (M, J0, J45).
  • The trained models were validated on a separate dataset of 350 eyes to predict their subjective refraction power vectors.

Main Results:

  • The AI models achieved significantly better prediction accuracy than the paraxial matching method.
  • Mean absolute errors for the predicted power vectors were 0.301 D (M), 0.120 D (J0), and 0.094 D (J45).
  • The models demonstrated high precision in predicting subjective refraction parameters.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning algorithms can accurately and precisely predict subjective refraction from novel polynomial wavefront data.
  • This AI-driven approach using aberrometry shows promise for developing objective refraction prediction methods.
  • The combination of AI and novel wavefront analysis may lead to a new gold standard in objective refraction.