Radicalradical chalcogen bonds: CSD analysis and DFT calculations.
Bartomeu Galmés1, Jaume Adrover1, Giancarlo Terraneo2
1Department of Chemistry Universitat de les Illes Balears, Crta. de Valldemossa km 7.5, 07122 Palma (Baleares), Spain.
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics : PCCP
|May 29, 2020
Summary
This study explores chalcogen bonding (ChB) in radical systems, combining crystallographic data and DFT calculations. It reveals how substituents influence ChB interactions, offering insights into self-assembly in crystalline materials.
Area of Science:
- Supramolecular Chemistry
- Materials Science
- Computational Chemistry
Background:
- Chalcogen bonding (ChB) is a significant non-covalent interaction.
- Radical systems present unique challenges and opportunities for ChB.
- Understanding ChB in radicals is crucial for designing novel materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate chalcogen bonding interactions involving radicals.
- To analyze the influence of substituents on ChB properties.
- To rationalize self-assembly motifs in the crystalline state.
Main Methods:
- Crystallographic analysis using the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD).
- Theoretical Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.
- Analysis of interaction energy, spin density, and charge/spin transfer.
Main Results:
- Benzodithiazolyl radical (BDTA) was used as a ChB acceptor.
- Dithiadiazolyl and diselenadiazolyl radicals served as ChB donors.
- Para-substituents (X) were found to affect interaction energy, spin density, and charge/spin transfer.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a detailed understanding of ChB in radical systems.
- Molecular surface electrostatic potentials accurately predict self-assembly motifs.
- Findings contribute to the rational design of crystalline materials through ChB.
Related Concept Videos
Radicals: Electronic Structure and Geometry
4.8K
This lesson delves into the geometry of a radical, which is influenced by the electronic structure of the molecule. The principle is similar to that of a lone pair, where the unpaired electron influences the geometry at the radical center.
Accordingly, the structure of a trivalent radical lies between the geometries of carbocations and carbanions. An sp2-hybridized carbocation is trigonal planar, while an sp3-hybridized carbanion is trigonal pyramidal. Here, the difference in geometry is...
Accordingly, the structure of a trivalent radical lies between the geometries of carbocations and carbanions. An sp2-hybridized carbocation is trigonal planar, while an sp3-hybridized carbanion is trigonal pyramidal. Here, the difference in geometry is...
4.8K
Radical Formation: Overview
2.5K
A bond can be broken either by heterolytic bond cleavage to form ions or homolytic bond cleavage to yield radicals. A fishhook arrow is used to represent the motion of a single electron in homolytic bond cleavage. There are two main sources from which radicals can be formed:
Radicals from spin-paired molecules:
Radicals can be obtained from spin-paired molecules either by homolysis or electron transfer. While two radicals are formed in the former, an electron is added in the...
Radicals from spin-paired molecules:
Radicals can be obtained from spin-paired molecules either by homolysis or electron transfer. While two radicals are formed in the former, an electron is added in the...
2.5K
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
30.1K
Crystal Field Theory
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
30.1K
Radical Reactivity: Overview
2.6K
Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired...
2.6K
Radical Halogenation: Stereochemistry
4.4K
Stereochemistry is the study of the different spatial arrangements of atoms in a given molecule. The stereochemistry of radical halogenations can be understood from three different situations:
Halogenation to form a new chiral center:
Halogenation to form a new chiral center:
4.4K
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
47.5K
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
47.5K


