Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Changes in occlusion after orthognathic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery·2023
Same author

A Case Report on Surgical-Orthodontic Correction of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Severe Prognathic Mandible and Retrognathic Maxilla.

Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences·2022
Same author

Minimally invasive genioplasty: an observational study.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery·2022
Same author

An evidence-based surgical algorithm for management of odontogenic keratocyst.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery·2022
Same author

Does Intraoperative Computed Tomography Scanning in Maxillofacial Trauma Surgery Affect the Revision Rate?

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 20, 2025

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.9K

Patient-specific implants for maxillofacial defects: challenges and solutions.

Nasser Alasseri1, Ahmed Alasraj2

  • 11Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|May 30, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Patient-specific implants (PSIs) offer accurate maxillofacial reconstruction, avoiding complications associated with traditional grafts and improving patient outcomes. This technology enhances both function and aesthetics in reconstructive surgery.

More Related Videos

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.8K
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 20, 2025

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

6.9K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.8K
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Maxillofacial defects present significant reconstructive challenges due to complex anatomy and functional/cosmetic impacts.
  • Traditional reconstruction methods using alloplastic implants or autogenous grafts are prone to complications like resorption, infection, and displacement.
  • Advancements in technology have introduced patient-specific implants (PSIs) for improved reconstructive outcomes.

Observation:

  • This study details the surgical experience with 10 patient-specific implants (PSIs) fabricated from PEEK (8) and titanium (2) across six patients with diverse maxillofacial defects.
  • The study meticulously documented the process of overcoming any encountered complications during PSI reconstruction.
  • Patient satisfaction was evaluated post-operatively, focusing on both functional restoration and aesthetic results.

Findings:

  • No immediate or follow-up complications were observed in any of the six patients who received PSI reconstructions.
  • All patients reported high satisfaction with the functional and cosmetic outcomes achieved through PSI.
  • Computer-designed PSIs facilitate precise reconstruction, mitigating common issues linked to conventional implants.

Implications:

  • Patient-specific implants represent a significant advancement in maxillofacial reconstruction, offering superior accuracy and patient satisfaction.
  • The elimination of common complications associated with traditional methods enhances the reliability of PSI in complex cases.
  • While effective, the high cost of patient-specific implants remains a notable drawback that warrants consideration in clinical application.