Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pathogen Detection and Disease Assessment in Real-Time Using M-ROSE
Published on: March 1, 2024
Pneumocystis Jirovecii detection and comparison of multiple diagnostic methods with quantitative real-time PCR in
Mohammad Y Alshahrani1, Mohammed Alfaifi1, Irfan Ahmad1
1Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract:
Pneumocystis jirovecii (PCP) remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with respiratory infections. Accurate diagnosis of PCP is still a diagnostic challenge. Hence, the main objectives were to study the incidence of Pneumocystis Jirovecii pneumonia infection among respiratory problems patients and to compare the real-time quantitative PCR technique with various diagnostic methodologies. Patients who have respiratory symptoms of PCP like breathlessness, cough, and fever were enrolled. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were collected and homogenized, and then smears were prepared for examination by Gomorimethanamine silver staining (GMSS), Immunofluorescent staining (IFAT), Toludine blue O (TBO), and Giemsa staining. Further, RT-PCR was also performed for the detection of PCP. The mean patients' age was 52 (SD ± 16) years. 41% were female, and 59% of the patients were male. Weight loss (80%), fever (92%), cough (100%), and dyspnea (76%) were the most common complaints. Twenty-eight patients have been diagnosed with pulmonary infiltrates using chest X-ray. Out of 100 patients, 35% were positive for PCP. The organism was detected using IFAT in all the 35 specimens, 15 of 35 (42.86%) by GMSS, 8 of 35 (17.6%) by Giemsa stain, and 1 of 35 (2.8%) was detected by TBO stains. RT-PCR showed that 39 patients was found to be positive for PCP. Thirty-five of these 39 patients had a positive IFAT (89.74%); the IFAT was negative or undefined in 4 samples. All 39 patients (100%) had signs and symptoms for PCP. Our results suggest that RT-PCR is still the most highly sensitive method for Pneumocystis Jirovecii detection. In poor resource settings where RT-PCR and IFAT is not available, diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia remains a complicated issue. In settings where RT-PCR & IFAT are not available, GMSS staining may be the next best choice to detect PCP.
Insights
Accurate diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is challenging. Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-PCR) offers the highest sensitivity for PCP detection, crucial for patient care.
Area of Science:
- Medical Mycology
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Microbiology
Background:
- Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a significant cause of mortality in immunocompromised patients.
- Accurate and timely diagnosis of PCP remains a clinical challenge, impacting patient outcomes.
- Existing diagnostic methods for PCP vary in sensitivity and accessibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of PCP among patients presenting with respiratory symptoms.
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of real-time quantitative PCR (RT-PCR) against conventional staining methods.
- To evaluate diagnostic strategies for PCP in resource-limited settings.
Main Methods:
- 100 patients with respiratory symptoms underwent diagnostic testing for PCP.
- Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were analyzed using Gomori methenamine silver staining (GMSS), immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT), Toluidine blue O (TBO), Giemsa stain, and RT-PCR.
- Clinical data including symptoms and chest X-ray findings were collected.
Main Results:
- PCP was diagnosed in 35% of the patients (35 out of 100).
- RT-PCR identified PCP in 39 patients, demonstrating the highest sensitivity (100% concordance with clinical symptoms).
- IFAT detected PCP in all 35 confirmed cases, while GMSS, Giemsa, and TBO showed lower detection rates (42.86%, 17.6%, and 2.8% respectively).
Conclusions:
- RT-PCR is the most sensitive diagnostic method for Pneumocystis jirovecii.
- In resource-limited settings without RT-PCR or IFAT, GMSS staining is the next best option for PCP diagnosis.
- Improved diagnostic accessibility is crucial for managing PCP effectively.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Real Time RT-PCR
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History

