Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Revision of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Hemiarthroplasty: Does it work?
Mihir Sheth1, Daniel Sholder2, Joseph Abboud2
1Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Background:
The projected increase in revision shoulder arthroplasty has increased interest in the outcomes of these procedures. Glenoid component removal and conversion to a hemiarthroplasty (HA) is an option for aseptic glenoid loosening after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA).
Methods:
We identified patients who had undergone revision shoulder arthroplasty over a 15-year period. 17 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a retrospective chart review was conducted for pre-surgical and operative data. We contacted patients at a mean follow-up of 70 months from revision surgery for implant survival, reoperations and functional outcomes scores.
Results:
Implant survival was estimated to be 88% at 2 years and 67% at 5 years. Mean ASES score for surviving implants was 58 ± 22. Mean SANE score was 54 ± 24, and mean VAS pain score was 3.5 ± 2.8. Mean SF-12 Mental and Physical scores were 46 ± 15 and 38 ± 10, respectively. Five patients (50% of those with surviving implants) reported being either very satisfied or satisfied with the status of their shoulder. There were complications in 6 patients (35%) and 5 patients (29%) required reoperation.
Conclusion:
HA following failed aTSA due to glenoid loosening produced modest clinical results and satisfaction rates. Reverse arthroplasty may be a more reliable treatment strategy in this patient population.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
07:45The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022