Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Patient and Family Member Experiences in Critical Care Research and Quality Improvement Projects
Suzanne Bench1, Alison O'Shea, Annette Boaz
1Suzanne Bench, PhD, RGN, is Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, King's College London, England. She is now at the time of this work was a Professor, London South Bank University, and Deputy Director, Research, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, England. Annette Boaz, PhD, is Professor, Kingston and St. Georges Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, London, England. Alison O'Shea, BSc, is Research Assistant, Kingston and St. Georges Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, London, England.
Background:
Public and patient involvement in healthcare research is increasing, but the effect of involvement on individuals, service delivery, and health outcomes-particularly in specialist population groups like critical care-remains unclear, as does the best way to involve people who have experienced critical illness.
Objectives:
The aim of the study was to explore former patients' and family members' views and experiences of involvement in critical care research and/or quality improvement.
Methods:
Using a qualitative methodology, semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with seven former intensive care unit patients and three close family members across England. Data were analyzed using a standard process of inductive thematic analysis.
Results:
Four key themes were identified: making it happen, overcoming hurdles, it helps, and respect and value. Findings center on the need for flexibility, inclusivity, and transparency. They further highlight the particular challenges faced by critical illness survivors and their family members in relation to research involvement, the importance of individualized support and training, and the vital role that project leads have in making people feel valued and equal partners in the process.
Discussion:
This is the first study to explore patients' experiences of involvement in critical care research. Despite the small, homogenous sample, the study provides valuable and important data to guide future practice. It highlights the need to enable and support people to make informed choices at a time when they are ready to do so. It further highlights the importance of gatekeepers to avoid vulnerable people contributing before they are ready-a practice that could negatively affect their health status.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Critical Thinking II
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...