Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

913
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
913
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.6K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.6K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

27.7K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
27.7K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

5.5K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
5.5K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

10.5K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
10.5K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Covid-19 vaccine tweak could better tackle today's variants.

New scientist (1971)·2023
Same author

Coronavirus mutations offer a new insight into evolution.

New scientist (1971)·2023
Same author

The next covid-19 vaccines.

New scientist (1971)·2023
Same author

Monkeypox unnoticed?

New scientist (1971)·2022
Same author

Mutation-inducing drugs could raise virus dangers.

New scientist (1971)·2022
Same author

Could vaccines end the pandemic?

New scientist (1971)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.5K

Rethinking testing.

Michael Le Page

    New Scientist (1971)
    |June 6, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary

    Weekly testing of all key workers, not just symptomatic individuals, could benefit many countries. This approach enhances public health surveillance and response capabilities.

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Public Health Policy

    Background:

    • Current COVID-19 testing strategies often focus on symptomatic individuals.
    • This reactive approach may miss asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic transmissions.
    • Key workers represent a critical population for maintaining essential services.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the potential benefits of widespread, regular testing for key workers.
    • To assess the impact of proactive surveillance on disease control.

    Main Methods:

    • The study likely involves modeling or analysis of testing strategies.
    • It may compare outcomes of symptomatic-only testing versus universal key worker testing.
    • Data on transmission dynamics and economic impact could be considered.

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
    05:26

    Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

    Published on: October 25, 2024

    1.6K
    Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
    09:00

    Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

    Published on: August 16, 2024

    1.1K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 19, 2025

    Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
    06:45

    Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

    Published on: April 18, 2017

    6.5K
    Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
    05:26

    Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

    Published on: October 25, 2024

    1.6K
    Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
    09:00

    Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

    Published on: August 16, 2024

    1.1K

    Main Results:

    • Widespread weekly testing of key workers could significantly improve early detection of infections.
    • This strategy may reduce overall transmission rates and the need for broader lockdowns.
    • Economic benefits from sustained essential service operation are probable.

    Conclusions:

    • Implementing regular, widespread testing for key workers is a recommended public health strategy.
    • Proactive surveillance offers advantages over symptom-based testing for disease management.
    • Countries should consider adopting this approach for enhanced pandemic preparedness.