Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
Understanding the Relationship Between Direct Experience and Risk Perception of Natural Hazards
Nicolás C Bronfman1,2, Pamela C Cisternas2,3, Paula B Repetto2,4
1Engineering Sciences Department, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Direct physical and emotional experiences after natural hazards significantly shape risk perception. Physical consequences directly increase risk perception, while emotional fear indirectly influences it through worry, impacting preparedness.
Area of Science:
- Disaster risk reduction
- Psychology of risk
- Natural hazard preparedness
Background:
- Risk perception is crucial for predicting natural hazard preparedness.
- Previous research on experience, preparedness, and risk perception yields inconsistent findings.
- Understanding the nuances of direct experience is vital for effective disaster risk management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of physical and emotional experiences on risk perception following a natural hazard.
- To explore the relationship between direct experience, risk perception, and preparedness behaviors.
- To analyze the mediating role of worry in the emotional experience-risk perception link.
Main Methods:
- A survey was administered to a representative sample (n=701) in Iquique, Chile, one month post-earthquake and tsunami (8.2 Mw).
- Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze nine proposed relationships between experience, risk perception, and preparedness.
- Key variables included direct physical experience, direct emotional experience, worry, risk perception, and preparedness actions.
Main Results:
- Direct physical experience positively influenced risk perception.
- Direct emotional experience indirectly influenced risk perception through worry.
- Emotional experience did not directly impact current preparedness or risk perception.
- The final SEM model demonstrated adequate fit, with six of nine proposed relationships being significant.
Conclusions:
- Direct physical and emotional experiences are key drivers of risk perception after natural hazards.
- Preparedness strategies should consider the distinct pathways through which physical and emotional experiences affect risk perception.
- Further research is needed to fully understand the complex interplay between experience, emotion, and preparedness in disaster contexts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Preparedness and Phobias
Relative Risk
Hazard Rate
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
The Availability Heuristic
Fundamental Attribution Error

