Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Mandatory Bicycle Helmet Laws in the United States: Origins, Context, and Controversies
Kathleen Bachynski1, Alison Bateman-House1
1Kathleen Bachynski is with the Public Health Program at Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA. Alison Bateman-House is with the Division of Medical Ethics and the Department of Population Health at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Abstract:
This article examines the origins and context of mandatory bicycle helmet laws in the United States. Localities began to enact such laws in the early 1990s, having experimented with helmet laws for motorcycles previously. As cycling became increasingly popular in the 1970s and 1980s because of a variety of historical trends, from improved cycle technology to growing environmental consciousness, cycling-related injuries also increased. Bicycle safety advocates and researchers alike were particularly troubled by head injuries. National injury surveillance systems and a growing body of medical literature on bicycle-related injuries motivated a number of physicians, cyclists, children, and other community members to advocate helmet laws, which they argued would save lives. Controversy over these laws, particularly over whether they should apply universally or only to children, raised public health ethics concerns that persist in contemporary debates over bicycle helmet policies. (Am J Public Health. 2020;110:1198-1204. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305718).
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Personal Protective Equipment
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I

