Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

740
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
740
Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

681
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
681
Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

1.2K
Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.
1.2K
Impact of Schemas01:30

Impact of Schemas

150
Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...
150
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.6K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Meaning-based guidance of attention in rhesus monkeys during naturalistic scene viewing.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Meaning maps predict reaction time in change detection.

Visual cognition·2025
Same author

Scene inversion impairs activation of scene-object semantic bias.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Episodic memory and semantic knowledge interact to guide eye movements during visual search in scenes: Distinct effects of conscious and unconscious memory.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

How schema knowledge influences memory in older adults: Filling in the gaps, or leading memory astray?

Cognition·2024
Same author

The role of local meaning in infants' fixations of natural scenes.

Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies·2024
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 18, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.0K

Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.

Deborah A Cronin1, Candace E Peacock2,3, John M Henderson2,3

  • 1Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. dacronin@ucdavis.edu.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|June 20, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual and verbal working memory tasks can both interfere with visual attention during scene viewing. Surprisingly, verbal working memory load impacted eye movements, challenging previous assumptions about distinct cognitive subsystems.

Keywords:
AttentionEye movementsScene-viewingVerbal working memoryVisual working memory

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.2K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

777

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 18, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.0K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.2K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

777

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Working memory is theorized to have separate visual and verbal subsystems.
  • Visual working memory studies often use verbal tasks or articulatory suppression as controls.
  • This assumes verbal load doesn't interfere with visual working memory processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interference between working memory load and visual attention during scene viewing.
  • To test the assumption that verbal working memory load does not interfere with visual tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed visual or verbal working memory tasks.
  • Eye movements were recorded while participants viewed scenes.
  • Interference between memory load and scene viewing behavior was analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Both visual and verbal working memory loads interfered with scene-viewing behavior.
  • Eye movements during scene viewing did not significantly interfere with memory task performance.
  • Verbal working memory load unexpectedly interfered with eye movements in a visual task.

Conclusions:

  • The findings challenge the strict separation of visual and verbal working memory subsystems.
  • Verbal working memory load can impact visual attention and eye movement control.
  • Further research is needed to understand the interaction between verbal working memory and visual processing.